期刊文献+

基于碳限额的寡头竞争企业定价和碳排量决策 被引量:3

Decisions of pricing and carbon emissions for duopoly-competition enterprises based on carbon cap
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了研究政府制定碳限额政策对具有不同碳排放水平的两个寡头竞争企业定价和碳排量决策的影响,研究了政府制定碳限额政策时使竞争企业利润最大化的生产决策,以及使政府获得经济、环境双重最优的碳限额政策。研究表明,相对于无碳限额约束下的收益,适当的碳限额约束政策均可提高两个企业的收益,存在一个最优的碳限额值使企业收益和碳排放量均获得Pareto改进;高碳企业的定价随着政府碳限额的增大先不变后减小;当高碳企业的基准碳排量大于低碳企业的基准碳排量时,低碳企业的定价随着碳限额的增大先减小后增大,反之低碳企业的定价随着碳限额的增大而减小,此时政府不实行碳限额政策将有利于碳减排技术的推广和实施。 To research the influence of carbon cap policy on pricing and carbon emission decisions of two duopolycompetition enterprises (high carbon enterprise and low carbon enterprise), the production decision which made competition enterprises profit maximize and the carbon cap policy which made government obtain economy and envi- ronment double optimum were analyzed. The result showed that The proper carbon cap policy constraint could im- prove two duopoly-competition enterprises' profit by comparing with no policy constraint, and an optimal carbon cap value which could make enterprises obtain Pareto improvement on earning and carbon emission was existed. The pri- cing of high carbon enterprise kept constant and then decreased with the increase of carbon cap. The pricing of lowcarbon enterprises decreased and then increased with the increase of carbon cap when the carbon emissions of high- carbon enterprises are greater than that of low-carbon enterprises. Otherwise, the pricing of low carbon enterprises decreased as the carbon cap increased, and the government did not implement the carbon cap policy would be conducive to the promotion and implementation of carbon emission reduction technology.
出处 《计算机集成制造系统》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第2期484-493,共10页 Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71601114 71431004) 上海海事大学顶级期刊论文培育基金资助项目~~
关键词 碳限额 减排技术 寡头竞争企业 定价决策 碳排量 carbon cap carbon reduction technology duopoly-competition enterprises pricing decision carbon emissions
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献110

  • 1王迎军.顾客需求驱动的供应链契约问题综述[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(2):68-76. 被引量:60
  • 2赵来军,李旭,朱道立,李怀祖.流域跨界污染纠纷排污权交易调控模型研究[J].系统工程学报,2005,20(4):398-403. 被引量:29
  • 3Oberthur S. , Ott, H. E.. The Kyoto Protocol:International Climate Policy for the 21st Century [M]. Berlin/ Heidelberg/New York, Springer, 1999.
  • 4香港环境保护署.2008空气污染管理(修订)条例草案[Z].香港,2008,http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr07-08/chinese/bills/brief/b26_brf.pdf.
  • 5魏一鸣,等.中国能源报告(2008):碳排放研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2008:134.
  • 6Monica, B. , Frabcesco, G.. Electricity pricing under "carbon emissions trading": A dominant firm with competitive fringe model [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(8) : 4200-4220.
  • 7Kara, M. , et al. The impacts of EU CO2 emissions trading on electricity markets and electricity consumers in Finland [J]. Energy Economics, 2008, 30(2) : 193-211.
  • 8Tsikalakis, A.G., Hatziargyriou, N.D.. Environmental benefits of distributed generation with and without emissions trading [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(6): 3395-3409.
  • 9Damien, D. , Philippe, Q.. European emission trading scheme and competitiveness: a case study on the iron and steel industry [J]. Energy Economics, 2007, 30 (4) : 2009-2027.
  • 10Rehdanz, K. , Tol, R. S. J.. Unilateral Regulation of Bilateral Trade in Greenhouse Gas Emission Permits [J]. Ecological Economics, 2005, 54(4): 397-416.

共引文献426

同被引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部