摘要
Background： Most studies on enhanced recovery after surgery （ERAS） for gastric cancer exclude patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Here, we aimed to evaluate whether patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be enrolled into the ERAS program for locally advanced gastric cancer. Methods： From April 2015 to July 2017, 114 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer were randomized into ERAS and standard care （SC） groups. Postoperative length of stay, complications, bowel function, and nutritional status were recorded. Results： The postoperative length of stay of the ERAS group was shorter compared with that of the SC group （5.9 ± 5.6 vs. 8.1 ± 5.3 days, P=0.037）.The postoperative complication rate was 9.3% in the ERAS group and 11.5% in the SC group（P=0.700）.The time to first flatus （2.7 ± 2.0 vs. 4.5 ± 4.6 days, P = 0.010） and time to a semi-liquid diet （3.2 ± 2.1 vs. 6.3 ± 4.9 days, P 〈 0.001） in the ERAS group were shorter compared with those in the SC group. On the 10thday after surgery, the values of weight, total protein, albumin, and prealbumin of the ERAS group were lower compared with those of the SC group. Conclusions： Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be enrolled into ERAS programs for locally advanced gastric cancer. The nutritional status of these patients was not adversely affected.
Background： Most studies on enhanced recovery after surgery （ERAS） for gastric cancer exclude patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Here, we aimed to evaluate whether patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be enrolled into the ERAS program for locally advanced gastric cancer. Methods： From April 2015 to July 2017, 114 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer were randomized into ERAS and standard care （SC） groups. Postoperative length of stay, complications, bowel function, and nutritional status were recorded. Results： The postoperative length of stay of the ERAS group was shorter compared with that of the SC group （5.9 ± 5.6 vs. 8.1 ± 5.3 days, P=0.037）.The postoperative complication rate was 9.3% in the ERAS group and 11.5% in the SC group（P=0.700）.The time to first flatus （2.7 ± 2.0 vs. 4.5 ± 4.6 days, P = 0.010） and time to a semi-liquid diet （3.2 ± 2.1 vs. 6.3 ± 4.9 days, P 〈 0.001） in the ERAS group were shorter compared with those in the SC group. On the 10thday after surgery, the values of weight, total protein, albumin, and prealbumin of the ERAS group were lower compared with those of the SC group. Conclusions： Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be enrolled into ERAS programs for locally advanced gastric cancer. The nutritional status of these patients was not adversely affected.
基金
This study was supported by the grants from the Social Development Fund of Jiangsu Province, China （No. BE2015687） and the National Natural Science Foundation of China （No. 81500417）.
