基于“好干部标准”的干部考核评价:模型建构与指标体系被引量：12

Assessment and Evaluation on the Basis of "Good Cadre Criterion" :Model Construction and Index System

导出

摘要通过开放式问卷调查、深度访谈、专家论证等方法,收集并修订领导干部评价的内容条目,建构基于"好干部标准"的考核评价结构模型。研究结果表明,"好干部标准"反映了新的历史时期干部群众对"好干部"的内隐认知,是对优秀领导干部期待与诉求的"实然"和"必然"。好干部评价的结构模型是一个包含"信念坚定""为民服务""勤政务实""敢于担当"和"清正廉洁"的五维度模型。研究基于五维度结构模型构建了考核评价指标体系,五个一级指标的权重系数由大至小依次为"信念坚定""敢于担当""清正廉洁""为民服务""勤政务实",并围绕好干部评价模型的时代内涵、五个指标的验证式考察及综合指标体系的构建开展了讨论。 Through open-ended questionnaire, in-depth interview, expert review and other means, this study collects and revises cadres＇ evaluation contents, and constructs the evaluation model based on the criterion of good cadres. The result shows that the criteria of good cadres reflect the implicit cognition of the masses on good cadres in the new historical period, and represent the expectations and appeals for good cadres. The evaluation model of good cadres is a five-dimensional model that covers being firm in their ideals and convictions, serving the people, being diligent in work, being ready to take on responsibilities, as well as being honest and upright. In the evaluation index system of good cadres, the weight coefficients of the five dimensions ranged in a descending order as follows： being firm in their ideals and convictions, being ready to take on responsibilities, being honest and upright, serving the people, and being diligent in work. Furthermore,the time connotation of the evaluation model, the validation oriented evaluation of the five dimensions and the construction of comprehensive index system are discussed in the study.

作者李明郭庆松

机构地区中共上海市委党校领导科学教研部中共上海市委党校

出处《中共中央党校学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第1期51-59,共9页 Journal of The Party School of The Central Committee of The C.T.C

基金国家社会科学基金青年项目"领导干部考核评价机制研究"(14CDJ012)

关键词好干部标准考核评价评价模型指标体系 Good Cadre Criterion, Assessment and Evaluation, Evaluation Model, Evaluation Index System

分类号 D262.3 [政治法律—中共党史]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献4

1杨明,尹军梅,吉根林.不平衡数据分类方法综述[J].南京师范大学学报（工程技术版）,2008,8(4):7-12. 被引量：28
2凌文辁,张治灿,方俐洛.中国职工组织承诺研究[J].中国社会科学,2001(2):90-102. 被引量：341
3李纪恒.党员干部要始终做到忠诚干净担当——深入学习习近平总书记关于好干部标准的重要论述[J].求是,2015(1):20-22. 被引量：12
4韩强.对建立和完善党政领导干部考核评价指标体系的若干思考[J].政治学研究,2003(4):37-45. 被引量：27

二级参考文献36

1凌文辁,陈龙,王登.CPM领导行为评价量表的建构[J].心理学报,1987,19(2):199-207. 被引量：113
2[18]Schapire R E,Singer Y.Improved boosting algorithms using confidence-rated predictions[J].Machine Learning,1999,37(3):297 -336.
3[19]Fan W,Stolfo S J,Zhang J,et al.AdaCost:misclassification cost-sensitive boosting[C]//Bratko I,Dzeroski S.Proc of the 16th Intern Conf on Meachine Learning.Morgan Kanfmann,1999:97-105.
4[20]Joshi M V,Kumar V,Agarwal R C.Evaluating boosting algorithms to classify rare classes:comparison and improvements[C]// Cercone N,Lin T Y,Wu X.Pro of the 2001 IEEE Intern Conf on Data Mining.Washington DC:IEEE Computer Society Press,2001:257 -264.
5[21]Chawla N V,Japkowicz,Kolcz A.Editorial:special issue on learning from imbalaneed data sets[J].SIGKDD Explorations Special Issue on Learning from Imbalanced Datasets,2004,6(1):1 -6.
6[22]Chawlal N V,Lazarevic A,Hall L O.SMOTEBoost:improving prediction of the minority class in boosting[C]// The 7th European Conf on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases.Berlin:Springer,2003:107-119.
7[23]He Guoxun,Han Hui,Wang Wenyuan.An over-sampling expert system for learning from imbalaneed data sets[J].Neural Networks and Brain,2005,1:537 -541.
8[25]Tao Ban,Shigeo Abe.Implementing multi-class classifiers by one-class classification methods[C]// 2006 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks Sheraton Vancouver Wall Centre Hotel.Vancouver,BC:IEEE Press,2006:16 -21,327 -332.
9[26]Sun Y.Cost-sensitive boosting for classification of imbalanced data[D].Canada:University of Waterloo,2007.
10[27]Constantinopoulos C,Likas A.Semi-supervised and active learning with the probabilistic RBF classifier[J].Artificial Neural Networks,2008,71(13):2489-2498.