关于“逆全球化”的方法论批判

A Methodological Critique on Deglobalization

在当代全球化中,既没有纯粹的自由贸易,也没有纯粹的贸易保护;在一些场合下贸易保护与贸易自由还是相互交叉、相互渗透的。只不过,有的时期内是贸易保护占据上风,而有的时期内是自由贸易占据上风。这在整体是由国家政府对本国经济活动的发展和保护与市场经济力量的世界性释放的矛盾运动决定的。但对某个或某些民族国家在一定的时期内实行贸易保护还是实行自由贸易,则要作具体分析。对于中国来说,当前新贸易保护主义及其所带来的一系列问题,既是挑战又是机遇。因此,从全球化的主体构成及其基本矛盾运动的规律和特点来看,不能把"逆全球化"这一词不加限制地加以使用,否则,对当代全球化变动及其趋势就难以有学术层面上的深入研究。

In the process of contemporary globalization, there is no pure trade liberalism or pure trade protectionism either. In some circumstances, protectionism and liberalism intertwines with and permeates each other. It＇s just that at certain time, protectionism takes the upper wind, while at others, liberalism does. This is in general decided by the conflicting movement of the government＇s efforts to develop and protect its national economic activities and the release at world level the market economic forces. It requires specific analysis on the implementation of protectionism or liberalism for a certain nation state at certain times. For China, the new conception of trade and the series of issues it brought with mean both opportunities and challenges. Therefore,from the perspective of the subject composition of globalization and the laws and features of its basic conflicting movement, the term deglobalization shall not be used unlimitedly. Otherwise, it will be rather difficult to have in-depth study of the changes and trends of modern globalization at the academic level.