“双一流”背景下中国心理学学术生产力的实证分析——基于C^(100)视角

An Empirical Analysis on Research Productivity of Psychology in China under the Background of “Double First-Class” Based on the Perspective of C^(100)

以学术为本是一流学科建设的内在逻辑。文章采用C100体系从期刊、机构和作者维度测评心理学学术生产力的状态。研究发现,跨学科研究能力不强,"一流"学术生产力相对较弱,作者规模过小,学科与大学的关系复杂化。建设"一流"心理学,需保持学科导向与问题导向的双重关注、学科演化力与优化力的相对平衡、高层次学术人才的引进与培养的共同关怀。

Academic research basis is the inherent logic of the construction of first-class discipline. This paper used the C100 index evaluation system to analyze the overall situation of academic productivity in psychology in China from the perspective of periodicals, institutions and authors. It found that psychology interdisciplinary research ability was not strong, ＂first-class＂ academic productivity was relatively weak, the team size was too small, and the relationship between the discipline of psychology and the university was complex. To establish ＂first-class＂ psychology, it must keep the dual focus with discipline oriented and problem oriented, maintain the relative balance between the evolutionary power and the optimization power of discipline, and realize the common concern of the introduction and cultivation of high-level academic talents.