期刊文献+

模糊综合信任量化算法 被引量:1

Trust Quantification Algorithm Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 动态信任关系确切量化是开放式网络应用环境中的一个核心问题,然而开放式网络应用环境中缺少管理权威机构使得实体难以有全局计算信息,常规数学函数不易对信任的主观性和动态性进行表示等综合因素,导致了动态信任难以确切量化。针对动态信任量化难以确切量化的问题,首先提出开放式网络环境中的信用和信誉两个概念,对信任的动态性进行表示,将其作为信任评判内容。应用模糊综合评判原理,建立模糊综合信任评判模型;然后以模型为基础,设计了一种模糊综合信任量化算法,并且通过构造信任评价记录表、主体访问记录表和客体评价表等数据结构对算法进行实现。最后对该算法进行仿真,结果分析表明,算法正确性能较好,实现了动态信任的确切量化。 Dynamic trust quantification is an important issue for open network environment, but no authority cen- ter in open network environment makes it difficult for entities to obtain global computing information, besides trust has the characters of fuzziness and dynamic, which leads to larger evaluation error during trust quantification calculated with ordinary mathematic formula. Facing this problem, firstly, two concepts of credit and reputation were defined to describe the dynamic of trust, and a trust quantification model was proposed by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation meth- od. Then a quantification algorithm based on the model was designed, and the trust evaluation table, visited table and visit evaluation table were constructed to realize the quantification algorithm. At last, the efficiency of the trust quan- tification algorithm was shown by simulation results, and the quantified value of trust is consistent to the behavior of the note in internetwork environment, so the trust quantification algorithm is feasible.
出处 《计算机仿真》 北大核心 2018年第3期180-183,189,共5页 Computer Simulation
基金 国家自然科学基金(61272500)
关键词 信用 信誉 模糊综合评判 信任量化 Credit Reputation Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation Trust quantification
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献90

  • 1丁卉,刘永红,曹生现.基于模糊-灰色聚类方法的城市空气质量评价研究[J].环境科学与技术,2013,36(S2):374-379. 被引量:27
  • 2苏羽,赵海,苏威积,张晓丹.基于模糊专家系统的评估诊断方法[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2004,25(7):653-656. 被引量:17
  • 3邹晓颖.大气环境质量评价的模糊综合评判模型[J].湖南有色金属,2006,22(1):56-59. 被引量:10
  • 4Felix G M, Gregorio M P. Towards pre-standardization of trust and reputation models for distributed and heterogeneous systems [J]. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 2010, 32(4) : 185 - 196.
  • 5Lopez J, Roman R, Agudo I, et al. Trust management systems for wireless sensor networks: Best practices [J]. Computer Communications, 2010, 33(9) : 1086 - 1093.
  • 6Kamvar S D, Schlosser M T, Garcia Molina H. The EigenTrust algorithm for reputation management in P2P networks [C]// Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2003: 640-651.
  • 7Goyal M K, Gupta P, Aggarwal A, et al. QoS based trust management model for Cloud IaaS [C]// 2012 2nd IEEE International Conference on Parallel Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC). Washington DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2012:843 - 847.
  • 8Sun Y L, Yu W, Han Z, et al. Information theoretic framework of trust modeling and evaluation for ad hoc networks [J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Selected Areas in Communications, 2006, 24(2) : 305 - 317.
  • 9Aivaloglou E, Gritzalis S. Hybrid trust and reputation management for sensor networks [J]. Wireless Networks, 2010, 16(5) : 1493- 1510.
  • 10Momani M, Challa S, Alhmouz R. Bayesian fusion algorithm for inferring trust in wireless sensor networks [J]. Journal of Networks, 2010, 5(7): 815-822.

共引文献74

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部