期刊文献+

中文版灵性需求量表的信效度研究 被引量:35

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Spiritual Needs Scale
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的引进灵性需求量表(SNS),并检验其信效度。方法对英文版SNS经Brislin法翻译和修订成中文版SNS,采取专家咨询法及分别对100例、298例癌症患者进行预调查和正式调查,评价其信度和效度。结果修订后的中文版SNS为5个维度23个条目,内容效度为0.980,各维度与量表总分之间的相关系数为0.557~0.873,5个公因子累积方差贡献率为57.885%;量表的Cronbach′sα系数为0.908,分半信度系数为0.926,重测信度系数为0.902。结论中文版SNS具有良好的信效度,可作为中国癌症患者灵性需求的评估工具。 Objective To translate the Spiritual Needs Scale(SNS)into Chinese and to test its reliability and validity.Methods The SNS was translated and revised into Chinese following Brislin′s model of cross-culture translation,then expert consultation,pilot survey with 100 cancer patients,and large sample survey with 298 cancer patients were conducted to test reliability and validity of the Chinese version of SNS.Results The revised Chinese version of SNS consisted of 5 dimensions and 23 items.The content validity index was 0.980 for the total scale.The correlation coefficients between each dimension score and the total score ranged from 0.557 to 0.873.Five factors were identified by exploratory factor analysis,accounting for 57.885% of the variance.The overall Cronbach′sαcoefficient was 0.908,Spearman-Brown split half coefficient was 0.926 and the test-retest reliability was 0.902.Conclusion The Chinese version of SNS is reliable and valid to evaluate spiritual needs of Chinese cancer patients.
出处 《护理学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第3期16-19,共4页 Journal of Nursing Science
基金 中华护理学会2015-2016年度立项科研课题项目(ZHKY201506)
关键词 癌症 灵性需求量表 翻译 修订 文化调适 评估工具 cancer Spiritual Needs Scale translation revision cultural adaptation assessment tool
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献34

  • 1许荷丽,蔡小莉,徐燕.晚期癌症患者临终需求的探讨[J].实用医技杂志,2005,12(06B):1650-1651. 被引量:4
  • 2Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 3Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 4Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 5Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 6Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 7Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.
  • 8Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197.
  • 9Polit DF,Beck CT.The content validity index:are you sure youknow what’s being reported?critique and recommendations[J].Res Nurs Health,2006,29(5):489–497.
  • 10Nora JJ.Causes old and new modes,mechanisms and models.Am Heart J,1993,125:1409

共引文献1054

同被引文献269

引证文献35

二级引证文献151

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部