学术文本读写转换之二:碎片信息管理及再叙述

Read-write Conversion in the Academic Compositions( Ⅱ) :The Fragment Information Management and Renarration

以作者身份操作的学术叙述,其实是同一研究主体以读者身份在文献互文性场域读取某一类有关联度的学术信息碎片,据此完成读写转换的再叙述。再叙述学术层次取决于碎片信息管理;非功利性再叙述驱动力来自碎片信息管理与自我认知之间存在待修补的认知差,认知差修补和叙述链延伸共同拓展再叙述空间。读写转换信息流呈现为碎片信息A<再叙述B的格局,形式上A≥B的读写转换不改B>A的实质。碎片信息管理及再叙述策略隐蔽地干预和影响研究成果流向哪一类或哪一种刊物,隐蔽的能量关乎学术表达系统与接受系统对接。"对接"似可理解为研究成果所涉学术范式、概念术语、学科史、学科前沿理论、技术路线、评价标准、出版物元话语等与发表该成果的出版物之间形成的无言的默契。

The academic narration is actually the author＇s renarration of read-write（R-W） conversion with the academic information fragments read by the same subject in the domain of intertextuaiity as a reader. The academic level of renarration depends on the fragment information management, and the non-utility renarration is driven by the cognitive gap to be repaired between the fragment information management and the self-cognition. Both the gap repair and the narrative chain expand the space of renarration. Therefore the R-W conversion information flow appears as the pattern of ＇ fragment information A＇ 〈 ＇ renarration B＇, and the form of A I〉 B does not change the essence of B 〉 A. In a word, the management of fragment information and the strategies of renarration secretly intervene and influence the researchers＇ submission tendency, i. e., the hidden energy is related with the connection of academic expression system and the acceptance system. To be specific, ＇ CONNECTION＇ can be understood as the tacit coordination between the academic models, the concepts of terms, the history of a subject, the advanced theories of a subject, the technical routes, the evaluative standards, the meta-discourses of publications of the research results and the publications where the results are printed.