期刊文献+

国产比伐卢定在老年急性冠脉综合征患者介入术中治疗效果

The therapeutic effect of bivalirudin during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究老年(年龄>65岁)急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者在经皮冠脉介入(PCI)治疗术中使用国产比伐卢定的安全和有效性。方法本研究通过回顾性分析我院35例PCI术中应用比伐卢定的老年ACS患者的临床资料,按1∶1匹配选取同期35例PCI治疗过程中常规应用普通肝素的老年ACS患者作为对照组,分析术后30 d内的主要不良心脑血管事件(major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events,MACCE)及出血并发症的发生情况。结果两组临床资料对比,差异无统计学意义。术后30 d内MACCE发生率分别为4例(11%)和5例(14%),差异无统计学意义;出血并发症发生率分别为1例(3%)和6例(17%),比伐卢定组优于普通肝素组(P<0.05)。结论老年ACS患者PCI术中使用比伐卢定与普通肝素相比,可减少术后30d内的出血事件发生率,且不增加MACCE的风险。 AIM To evaluate the efficiency and safety of bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary inter- vention (PCI) in elderly patients ( Age 〉 65 ) with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS Medical records were analyzed in 35 patients given bivalirudin during PCI. The same type of records were screened in which unfractionated heparin (UFH) was used during PCI at a ratio of 1 : 1 for a control group of 35 patients. The main endpoint events included major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and severe bleeding complications at 30 days. RESULTS There were no significant differ- ences between the two groups. The incidences of MACCE (11% vs. 14% ), which was 4 for bivalirudin and 5 for heparin at 30 days, demonstrated no statistical significance. The incidences of bleeding (3% vs. 17% , P 〈0.05) , which was 1 for bivalirudin and 6 for heparin, showed that the bivalirudin group is superior to the heparin group. CONCLUSION The use of bivalirudin resulted in a decrease in bleeding events without significant difference in MACCE compared with heparin alone at 30 days.
出处 《心脏杂志》 CAS 2018年第2期159-161,169,共4页 Chinese Heart Journal
关键词 比伐卢定 肝素 老年 急性冠脉综合征 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 bivalirudin heparin aged acute coronary syndrome percutaneous coronary intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献11

  • 1Genereux P, Giustino G, Witzenbichler B, et al. Incidence, predictors, and impact of post-discharge bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2015, 66 (9) :1036-1045.
  • 2Lopes RD,Alexander KP, Manoukian SV, et al. Advanced age, antithrombotic strategy, and bleeding in non-st-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: Results from the acuity (acute catheterization and urgent intervention triage strategy) trial. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2009,53 ( 12 ) : 1021-1030.
  • 3Stone GW ,Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, et al. Heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor versus bivalirudin monotherapy and paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONS-AMI): final 3-year results from a muhicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2011, 377(9784) :2193-2204.
  • 4Han Y,Guo J, Zheng Y, et al. Bivalirudin vs. heparin with or without tirofiban during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction : The BRIGHT randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 2015,313 ( 13 ) : 1336-1346.
  • 5Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: A consensus report from the bleeding academic research consortium. Circulation, 2011,123 ( 23 ) :2736-2747.
  • 6Cutlip DE,Windecker S, Mehran R, et al. Academic Research Consortium. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: A case for standardized definitions. Circulation, 2007,115 ( 17 ) :2344- 2351.
  • 7Warkentin TE, Levine MN, Hirsh J, et al. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients treated with low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin, N Engl J Med, 1995,332 (20) :1330-1335.
  • 8Authors/Task Force members, Windecker S, Kolh P, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J, 2014,35 (37) :2541-2619.
  • 9Lincoff AM, Kleiman NS, Kereiakes DJ, et al. Long-term efficacy of bivalirudin and provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade vs. heparin and planned glycoprotein Ilb/llla blockade during pereutaneous coronary revascularization : Replace-2 randomized trial. JAMA, 2004, 292(6) :696-703.
  • 10Stone GW, Ware JH, Bertrand ME, et al. Antlthrombotic strategies in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing early invasive management: One-year results from the acuity trial. JAMA, 2007, 298(21 ):2497-2506.

共引文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部