期刊文献+

核电接管安全端308L/309L异种金属焊接接头拉伸断裂行为 被引量:1

Tensile fracture behavior of nuclear safe-end 308L/309L dissimilar metal welded joints
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对核电接管安全端异种金属焊接接头(SA508-3-308L/309L-316L)进行拉伸、硬度试验及显微组织观察,确定接头拉伸断裂位置并研究断裂位置产生原因。结果表明:焊缝在接头具有最低强度及塑性,断裂位置为焊缝隔离层;隔离层中铁素体大部分呈板条状,因此隔离层裂纹扩展穿透两相界面相对较少,裂纹扩展阻力更小;隔离层相对于对接焊缝硬度更高,隔离层具有高的位错密度,因此残余应力大,导致硬度升高,降低隔离层临界塑性变形能力;焊缝与SA508-3钢为低强度匹配,高的三轴应力及塑性应变主要分布在隔离层内,裂纹更易萌生。 The tensile,hardness test and microstructure observation of SA508-309 L/308 L-316 L dissimilar metal welded safe-end joints(DMWJs) were carried out,and the tensile fracture position of the joints was determined and the cause of fracture position was studied.The results show that the weld seam has the lowest strength and ductility in the joints,and the fracture position is the buttering layer of the weld seam.The ferrite in the buttering layer is lath-shaped;so the crack propagation in the buttering layer penetrates the two-phase interface relatively less,and the resistance of crack propagation is even smaller.The buttering layer has higher hardness compared with the butt weld seam,and the buttering layer has high dislocation density.Therefore,the residual stress is large,resulting in the increase of hardness and the critical plastic deformation ability of the buttering layer.The weld seam and SA508-3 base metal have low strength matching,and the high triaxial stress and plastic strain are mainly distributed in the buttering layer,and the crack is more prone to initiation.
出处 《材料热处理学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第3期144-150,共7页 Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment
基金 工业转型升级强基工程(TC150B5C0/20) 重庆市重点产业共性关键技术创新专项(cstc2015zdcy-ztzx50002)
关键词 异种金属焊接 拉伸 断裂位置 核电接管安全端 308L/309L dissimilar metal welding tensile fracture position nuclear safe-end 308L/309L
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献32

  • 1栗卓新,李国栋,魏琪,蒋建敏.不锈钢焊接冶金的研究进展[J].中国机械工程,2005,16(2):184-187. 被引量:22
  • 2马维甸 张式程 等.低匹配焊接接头不均匀裂纹体的J积分研究[J].焊接学报,1987,8(2):89-96.
  • 3Minami F, Ohata M, Toyoda M. Determination of required toughness of materials considering transferability to fracture performance evaluation for structure components [J].Journal Society of Naval Architects of Japan,1997, 182(2):647~657.
  • 4Minami F, Ohata M, Toyoda M. Fracture toughness requirement for fracture performance evaluation of welded joints based on the local approach [C]. In: Proc. 15th. Conf. OMAE Florence. 1996, New York: ASME, 1996.193~132.
  • 5Minami F, Hada S. Analysis of strength Mis-matching of welds on fracture performance of welded joints [C].IIW Doc. X-1254-92.
  • 6Tang W, Shi Y W. Influence of strength matching and crack depthon fracture parameters of welded joints[A].Mis-matching of Welds[C].Mechanical Engineering Publication Limited,London,1994.433~443.
  • 7霍立兴.某些制造因素对构件强度的影响[J].焊接学报,1988,9(1):51-58.
  • 8佐藤邦彦.溶接结构要览[M].东京:黑目出版社,1988.46~63.
  • 9铃木春义 田村博.焊接金属学[M].北京:机械工业出版社,1982..
  • 10埃里希,福克蛤德.不锈钢焊接冶金[M].栗卓新,朱学军,译.北京:化学工业出版社,2004:56-68.

共引文献48

同被引文献31

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部