期刊文献+

寻找公平的决策权分配方案——当代规范政治理论从平等到公平导向的转型 被引量:2

Seeking Fair Solution to Distribution of Decision-making Power——Transition of Contemporary Normative Political Theory from Equality to Fairness
原文传递
导出
摘要 政治是围绕决策权的分配所展开的各种活动。政治理论的任务则是要解决两大问题。第一,谁应当拥有决策权力;第二,谁应当拥有多少决策权力。近代政治理论提供了一种平等的决策权分配方案,任何人只要被承认了一个国家的公民身份,就获得了决策权力,而且是与其他所有拥有公民身份的人完全相同的决策权力。但随着国际联系的加深与外部性的普遍化,这种公民身份民主已无力解决许多政治冲突,当代政治理论开始了寻找公平的决策权分配方案的努力,并提出了一种比例原则,要求将所有利害关系人纳入决策,并根据每一利害关系人的利害程度来分配决策权力。这种利害关系人民主为解决当前的许多政治冲突提供了一种新的思路。 Politics involves a variety of activities around the distribution of decision-making power. The task of politi- cal theory is to solve two major problems. First, who should have the decision-making power; second, who should have the appropriate amount of power in decision-making. Modern political theory provides an equality-based distribution plan for de- cision-making power. Anyone who has been recognized as a citizen of a country gains decision-making power, and has the same amount of decision-making power as all the other people with the same citizenship. However, with the deepening of international connections and the universality of externalities, this kind of citizenship-based democracy has been unable to solve many political conflicts. Contemporary political theory has begun efforts to find a fair distribution plan for decision- making power, and proposed a principle of proportionality that integrates all stakeholders in the decision-making process and allocate decision-making authority based on the degree of interest for each stakeholder. Such stakeholder-based democ- racy has provided a new way of thinking for resolving many current political conflicts.
作者 张乾友
出处 《江苏行政学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第2期90-97,共8页 The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute
基金 江苏省社科基金青年项目"以公平正义为导向的治理权力配置研究"(17ZCC001)的阶段性成果
关键词 公平 民主 比例原则 利害关系人 fairness democracy proportionality principle stakeholders
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献8

  • 1孙景民.冲突与合作:主权国家与非政府组织[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,33(2):42-45. 被引量:6
  • 2基欧汉.霸权之后:世界政治经济中的合作与纷争[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2001:38.
  • 3张康之.论合作[J].南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学),2007,44(5):114-125. 被引量:62
  • 4弗雷泽.正义的中断--对“后社会主义”状况的批判性反思[M].于海青,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2009.
  • 5U.Beck.World Risk Society[M].Cambridge:Polity Press,1999.
  • 6彼特·辛格.饥荒,富裕者和道德[M]//徐向东.全球正义.杭州:浙江大学出版社,2010.
  • 7巴雷特.合作的动力-为何提供全球公共产品[M].黄智虎,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2012.
  • 8张康之.为了人的共生共在[M].北京:人民出版社,2016.

共引文献4

同被引文献23

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部