期刊文献+

管理会计中的“数目捷径”:关于数目启发式对投资决策影响的行为学分析 被引量:6

The Numerosity Heuristic in Management Accounting:A Behavioral Study of the Influence of Numerical Heuristics on Investment Decisions
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文通过两项研究考查数目启发式(即人们根据量化信息进行决策时过度依赖表面数目大小而忽略其它重要信息的认知误差)对管理会计投资决策的影响。在第一项问卷研究中,我们发现使用数量和概率信息进行决策时,表面数目大小对决策者有着重要影响,导致决策者偏离理性分析及形成决策误差。在第二项实验研究中,我们发现在对确定性收益项目和不确定性收益项目进行抉择的任务中,当确定性收益项目用大数目(即小计量单位)表述时,决策者比同样的项目用小数目(即大计量单位)表述更有可能选择该项目。但在对确定性损失项目和不确定性损失项目进行比较抉择时,确定性损失项目的大小数目表述形式对决策者影响并不显著。 The two study examined the influence of numemsity heuristics on management accounting behavior, especially the investment decision. In the first study, we predicted and found that in the investment decision task with quantity and probability information, the numerosity heuristics has sig- nificant impact on the decision making and cause the bias from the rational decision process. In the second experiment study, we predicted and found in the investment decision task of the comparative choice between certainty and uncertainty earnings projects, decision-makers prefer the projects with cer- tainty earnings expressed in large numbers than projects with certainty earnings present in small numbers But when comparing the certainty loss projects with the uncertainty loss projects, the influence of express format of numbers to decision making is not significant.
出处 《会计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第1期46-52,共7页 Accounting Research
基金 中国博士后科学基金项目(2017M610709) 中央高校基本科研业务专项资金(JBK170165)的资助
关键词 数目启发式效应 管理会计信息 投资决策行为 行为会计 实验研究 numerosity heuristic effect management accounting information investment decision-making behavior behavior accounting experi- mental research
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1Bazerman, M. 1998. Judgement in Managerial Decision Making. John Wiley & Son, New York
  • 2Fagley, N. S. and P. M. Miller. 1997. Framing Effects and Arenas of Choice: Your Money or Your Life? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71 - 3 : 355-373
  • 3Luft, J, L. and R. Libby. 1997. Profit comparison, market prices and managers judgments about negotiated transfer prices. The Accounting Review, April: 72
  • 4Miller, P. M. and N. S. Fagley. 1991. The Effects of Framing, Problem Variations, and Providing Rationale on Choice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, October: 517-522.
  • 5Peggy Ann Hughes. 1999. The Framing Effect on Domestic Transfer Pricing Decisions. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
  • 6Simon, H. 1986. Rationality in Psychology and Economics. Journal of Business, Vol 59: 4:209 -224
  • 7Spicer, B. H. 1988. Towards an Organizational Transfer Pricing Process. Accounting Organizations and Society,, 13 : 3 : 303-322
  • 8Tversky, A. and D. Kakneman. 1986. Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions. Joumal of Business, 59:251 -294
  • 9Watts, R. L., and Zimmerman, J. L.. 1986. Positive Accounting Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Prentice-Hall
  • 10周业安.行为经济学是对西方主流经济学的革命吗[J].中国人民大学学报,2004,18(2):32-38. 被引量:50

共引文献7

同被引文献65

引证文献6

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部