摘要
本文从论文产出数量、质量以及效率三个方面,对4个代表性联合基金进行了比较分析。研究发现,与其经费规模一样,4类联合基金在SCI论文产出的数量、质量以及效率三个方面保持了一致排名,即依次为大科学装置、NSAF、天文以及钢铁联合基金。大科学装置联合基金在ESI高被引论文以及重点支持项目产出效率方面的优势尤为突出。NSAF、天文以及钢铁联合基金论文平均影响力低于全球平均水平。
A comparison between four kinds of joint science foundations is conducted in this paper from perspective of quantity,quality and efficiency of their publications.The result indicates that,as same as their expenditure scale,four joint science foundations maintain a consistent ranking in each aspects of quantity,quality and efficiency,namely,Large-scale Scientific Facility,NSAF,Astronomy and Steel joint science foundation.Large-scale Scientific Facility joint science foundation behaves well at ESI highly cited paper and efficiency of key-supported programs.The publication impacts of NSAF,Astronomy and Steel joint science foundation is much lower than the global average level.
出处
《中国科学基金》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2018年第2期170-173,共4页
Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China
关键词
联合基金
产出数量
质量
效率
比较
Joint Science Foundation
quantity
quality
efficiency
comparison
