2Boos N, Webb JK. Pedicle screw fixation in spinal disorders: a Eu- ropean view. Ear Spine J, 1997, 6: 2-18.
3Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, et al. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine, 2004, 29: 1938-1944.
4Mulholland RC, Sengupta DK. Rationale, principles and experimental evaluation of the concept of soft stabilization. Eur Spine J, 2002, 11 Suppl 2: S198-S205.
5Rivard CH. Rhalmi S. Coillard C. In vivo biocompatibility testing of peek polymer for a spinal implant system: a study in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res, 2002, 62: 488-498.
6Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials, 2007, 28: 4845-4869.
7Bono CM, Kadaba M, Vaecaro AR. Posterior pedicle fixation-tmsed dynamic stabilization devices for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Teeh, 2009, 22: 376-383.
8Highsmith JM, Tumialan I,M, Rodts GJ. Flexible rods and the case for dynamic stabilization. Neurosurg Focus, 2007, 22: E11.
9Ponnappan R K, Serhan H, Zarda B, et al. Biomechanical evaluation and comparison of polyetheretherketone rod system to traditional tita- nium rod fixation. Spine J, 2009, 9: 263-267.
10De Iure F, Bosco G, Cappuccio M, et al. Posterior lumbar fusion by peek rods in degenerative spine: preliminary report on 30 cases. Eur Spine J, 2012, 21 Suppl 1: S50-S54.
