期刊文献+

主动脉瓣置换术后患者腹胀原因分析及不同减压方法的疗效比较

The analysis of the cause of abdominal distension in patients after aortic valve replacement and the comparison of the effect of different gastrointestinal decompression methods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析主动脉瓣置换术后患者出现腹胀的原因,比较不同减压方法在主动脉瓣置换术后中重度腹胀患者中的疗效。方法①选取2015年01月至2017年01月期间在我科行主动脉瓣置换术的患者,多因素Logistic regression分析腹胀的危险因素。②上述研究对象中术后出现中重度腹胀并需要胃肠减压的患者,随机分为2组,分别选用不同的减压方法:A组经鼻置入小肠减压管,B组经鼻置入普通胃管。比较2组患者腹胀缓解有效率以及缓解时间。结果①498例主动脉瓣置换术后患者出现腹胀132例,发生率为26.5%。多因素Logistic regression分析显示术后持续镇静/肌松时间≥72h是腹胀的独立危险因素。② A组52例患者腹胀缓解41例,缓解有效率为78.8%,缓解时间为46.9±18.6h;B组51例患者腹胀缓解30例,缓解有效率为58.8%,缓解时间为55.2±21.4h。A组腹胀缓解有效率明显高于B组,且缓解时间明显短于B组,差异有统计学意义。结论主动脉瓣置换术后患者持续镇静/肌松时间≥72h是腹胀的独立危险因素。小肠减压管在胃肠减压方面较普通胃管疗效更为显著,心脏术后患者出现腹胀需要胃肠减压时,可优先考虑使用。 Objectives To analyze the cause of abdominal distension in patients after aortic valve replacement and to compare the effect of different gastrointestinal decompression methods. Methods ①The clinical data of patients after aortic valve replacement from Jan 2015 to Jan 2017 were collected and analyzed to find the cause of abdominal distension by Multivariate logistic regression. ②The patients with moderate or severe abdominal distension from the first study section, who needed gastrointestinal decompression, were chosen and randomly divided into 2 groups according to different gastrointestinal decompression methods. Patients in the A group were given the small intestine decompression tube, and patients in the B group were given the stomach tube. The effect and time of abdominal distension relief were compared between 2 groups. Results ①There were 132 patients with abdominal distension after aortic valve replacement(132/498,26.5%). Multivariate logistic regression shows the continuous time of sedatives/ muscle relaxants ≥72h was the independent risk factor for abdominal distension. ②The abdominal distension relief rate was 78.8%(41/52) and the relief time was 46.9±18.6h in the A group. The abdominal distension relief rate was 58.8%(30/51) and the relief time was 55.2±21.4h in the B group. There was significant difference on the relief rate and time between 2 groups, and the A group was better. Conclusions The continuous time of sedatives/ muscle relaxants ≥72h is the independent risk factor for abdominal distension in patients after aortic valve replacement. The small intestine decompression tube is better than the stomach tube for patients who need gastrointestinal decompression after aortic valve replacement.
作者 薛清 李宁 褚恒 韩林 徐志云 XUE Qing, LI Ning, CHU Heng, et al.(Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Second Mili- tary Medical University, Shanghai 200433, Chin)
出处 《中国心血管病研究》 CAS 2018年第3期246-249,共4页 Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Research
基金 国家科技部重点研发计划(项目编号:2016YFC1100900) 国家自然科学基金(项目编号:81770383,81570351)
关键词 主动脉瓣置换术 腹胀 胃肠减压 Aortic valve replacement Abdominal distension Gastrointestinal decompression
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献59

  • 1Joep PM Derikx,Misha DP Luyer,Erik Heineman,Wim A Buurman.Non-invasive markers of gut wall integrity in health and disease[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(42):5272-5279. 被引量:9
  • 2田丽,贾春雨.4例低位急性肠梗阻病人应用肠梗阻导管结肠冲洗的护理[J].中华护理杂志,2006,41(6):506-508. 被引量:26
  • 3Plusczyk T,Bolli M,Schilling M. [Ileus disease]. Chirurg 2006; 77: 898-903.
  • 4Shittu OB,Gana JY,Alawale EO,Ogundiran TO. Pattern of mechanical intestinal obstruction in Ibadan: a ten year re- view. Afr J Med Med Sci 2001; 30: 17-21.
  • 5Wolfson PJ,Bauer JJ,Gelernt IM,Kreel I,Aufses AH. Use of the long tube in the management of patients with small- intestinal obstruction due to adhesions. Arch Surg 1985; 120: 1001-1006.
  • 6Gowen GF. Long tube decompression is successful in 90% of patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 2003; 185: 512-515.
  • 7Snyder CL,Ferrell KL,Goodale RL,Leonard AS. Nonopera- tive management of small-bowel obstruction with endoscop- ic long intestinal tube placement. Am Surg 1990; 56: 587-592.
  • 8Sprouse LR,Arnold CI,Thow GB,Burns RP. Twelve-year experience with the Thow long intestinal tube: a means of preventing postoperative bowel obstruction. Am Surg 2001; 67: 357-360.
  • 9Fazel MZ,Jamieson RW,Watson CJ. Long-term follow-up of the use of the Jones’ intestinal tube in adhesive small bowel obstruction. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2009; 91: 50-54.
  • 10Fleshner PR,Siegman MG,Slater GI,Brolin RE,Chandler JC,Aufses AH. A prospective,randomized trial of short versus long tubes in adhesive small-bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 1995; 170: 366-370.

共引文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部