期刊文献+

核酸荧光染料在单细胞凝胶电泳中的染色比较 被引量:1

Comparison of 4 kinds of nucleic acid fluorescent dyes in single-cell gel electrophoresis assay
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨4种核酸染料(EB、SYBR GreenⅠ、Gold View和AO)在单细胞凝胶电泳(SCGE)中的染色特性,以分析用新型核酸荧光染料代替EB染料的可能性。方法分离提取健康人外周血淋巴细胞,分别用0、20、40、60、80μg/m L的H2O2进行处理,中性SCGE检测淋巴细胞DNA损伤情况;分别用EB、SYBR GreenⅠ、Gold View和AO进行染色,荧光显微镜下观察并比较染色结果。分析尾部DNA百分含量(%Tail DNA)以比较组间差异。结果 SCGE结果表明,SYBR GreenⅠ、Gold View和AO均能很好的反应实验结果,不同浓度中,1×~5×SYBR GreenⅠ、2×~5×Gold View、2~5μg/m L AO为最佳染色浓度范围。EB、SYBR GreenⅠ、Gold View和AO的回归系数分别为2.71、2.81、2.73、2.75,其染色效果较为一致,稳定性分析结果表明,3组细胞在48 h以内结果稳定,%Tail DNA差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05);SYBR GreenⅠ、Gold View和AO实验室内精密度分别为6.92%、7.10%、8.25%,优于EB染色(8.35%);SYBR GreenⅠ和Gold View重复性分别为3.07%、2.74%,优于EB染色(3.59%)。结论SYBR GreenⅠ、Gold View和AO均可用于本实验染色,Gold View是更适合用于SCGE中替代EB的核酸荧光染料。 Objective To investigate the DNA staining efficiencies of 4 kinds of nucleic acid fluorescent dyes,including EB,SYBR Green Ⅰ,Gold View and AO,in single-cell gel electrophoresis( SCGE) assay,and the possibility to use a new nucleic acid fluorescent dye instead of EB. Methods The peripheral blood lymphocytes from healthy individuals were isolated and treated with 0,20,40,60 and 80 μg/m L of H2 O2,respectively. Then,the DNA damages of lymphocytes were detected by the neutral SCGE assay. The DNA was stained with EB,SYBR Green Ⅰ,Gold View and AO dyes,respectively,and the staining results were observed and compared under a fluorescence microscope. In addition,the percentages of tail DNA( % Tail DNA) from different staining methods were analyzed and compared. Results The results of SCGE showed that SYBR Green Ⅰ,Gold View and AO staining could well reflect the DNA damages of lymphocytes,and that the optimal concentrations for SYBR Green Ⅰ,Gold View and AO were 1 ×-5 ×,2 ×-5 ×and 2-5 μg/m L,respectively. The regression coefficients for EB,SYBR Green Ⅰ,Gold View and AO were 2. 71,2. 81,2. 73 and2. 75,respectively,which indicated that there was consistent dyeing effect between them. The results of % Tail DNA were stable within 48 hours,and there was no significant difference between the 4 fluoresent dyes( P 0. 05). The inter-assay coefficients of variation( CVs) of SYBR Green I,Gold View and AO were 6. 92%,7. 10% and 8. 25%,respectively,which were superior to that of EB( 8. 35%). The intra-assay CVs of SYBR Green I and Gold View were 3. 07% and 2. 74%,respectively,which were superior to that of EB( 3. 59%). Conclusion SYBR Green I,Gold View and AO may be used for the nucleic acid fluorescent staining,and especially Gold View is more suitable for instead of EB in SCGE.
作者 杨丽艳 王竹 刘圆圆 徐克前 YANG Liyan, WANG Zhu, LIU Yuanyuan, XU Keqian(Department of Laboratory Medicine, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha 410013, Hunan, Chin)
出处 《临床检验杂志》 CAS CSCD 2018年第2期81-85,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(81273002 81471499)
关键词 核酸荧光染料 溴化乙锭 单细胞凝胶电泳 安全性 nucleic acid fluorescent dye ethidium bromide single-cell gel electrophoresis safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献35

  • 1吴永明,夏欣一,黄宇烽.精子DNA完整性检测技术研究进展[J].中华男科学杂志,2006,12(8):737-741. 被引量:19
  • 2Lunn G,Sansone EB.Ethidium bromide:destruction and decontamination of solutions[J].Anal Biochem,1987,162(2):453-458.
  • 3Lunn G.Decontamination of ethidium bromide spills[J].Trends Genet,1990,6(2):31.
  • 4Bensaude O.Ethidium bromide and safety-readers suggest alternative solutions[J].Trends Genet,1988,4(4):89-90.
  • 5Singer VL,Lawlor TE,Yue S.Comparison of SYBR Green Ⅰ nucleic acid gel stain mutagenicity and ethidium bromide mutagenicity in the Salmonella/mammalian microsome reverse mutation assay (Ames test)[J].Mutat Res,1999,439(37):37-47.
  • 6Tuma RS,Beaudet MP,Jin X,et al.Characterization of SYBR Gold nucleic acid gel stain:a dye optimized for use with 300-nm ultraviolet transilluminators[J].Anal Biochem,1999,268(2):278-288.
  • 7Miller SE,Taillon-Miller P,Kwok PY.Cost-effective staining of DNA with SYBR Green in preparative agarose gel electrophoresis[J].Biotechniques,1999,27(1):34-36.
  • 8Lewis SE, John Aitken R, Conner S J, et al. The impact of sperm DNA damage in assisted conception and beyond: Recent advances in diagnosis and treatment. Reprod Biomed Online, 2013, 27 (4) : 325-337.
  • 9Ribas-Maynou J, Garcia-Peir6 A, Fern6ndez-Encinas A, et al. Comprehensive analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation by five dif- ferent assays: TUNEL assay, SCSA, SCD test and alkaline and neutral comet assay. Andrology, 2013, 1 (5) : 715-722.
  • 10Simon L, Lutton D, McManus J, et al. Sperm DNA damage measured by the alkaline comet assay as an independent predictor of male infertility and in vitro fertilization success. FertiI Steril,2011, 95 (2) : 652-657.

共引文献14

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部