期刊文献+

考虑退货风险的制造商双渠道供应链定价决策研究 被引量:48

Research on the Pricing Decision of Manufacturer Dual-channel Supply Chain Considering Return Risk
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对事前不确定性导致的退货问题,从消费者行为出发,建立考虑定价差异和退货风险双重因素的市场需求函数,通过Stackelberg博弈模型研究四种不同市场需求情形在不同定价模式下双渠道供应链的最优决策。在数值仿真部分,对不同情形决策之间比较、供应链收益进行比较分析。研究表明:电子渠道销售价格与电子渠道的市场基本需求成正比,批发价和传统渠道销售价格与传统渠道的市场基本需求成正比,实体店体验服务水平和传统渠道的市场基本需求的关系(线性关系)则根据某些条件而定;退货风险对供应链决策的影响与定价模式、市场需求影响因素相关;制造商偏好于定价不相等模式,零售商偏好于定价相等模式;退货风险与定价差异对供应链成员收益的影响与定价模式相关,对整体供应链收益的影响与定价模式和退货率大小有关。 In the process of re-shopping, customers are hard to get an accurate evaluation due to their full understanding of product information infringement. The exante uncertainty of product value evaluation is likely to have the problem that products are not in line with the consumer preferences, which causes the occurrence of product returns. Compared to the traditional channels, because customers cannot have close physical contact with the products while they are shopping online, the mismatching between products and their preferences makes the returns more serious. First of all, in terms of the returns caused by exante un- certainty, it should consider the influence of return risks on market demands from the consumer behaviors (rational consumers will reduce their purchase desires, because they can anticipate the pricing differences and the utility loss brought by return risk in the shopping decision-making process), and the construction absorbs the demand function of return factors. Then, through the Stackelberg game model, double channel supply chain optimal decisions of the four conditions are studied in the different pricing models. At last, through the example analysis, the result of the models is verified and a series of valuable conclusions are drawn. The research shows that price in electronic channels is positively proportional to the market de- mand of electronic channels, the wholesale price is positively proportional to sales price and market de- mands of traditional channels, the relationship between the SA service level and market basic demands of traditional channels (linear) depend on certain conditions; the impact of return risks to supply chain deci- sion is related to pricing mode and the influence of market demand; manufacturers prefer the pricing ine- quality model and retailers love the pricing equality model; the impact of return risks and pricing difference to supply chain member revenue is associated with pricing model, the impact of the overall supply chain revenue is related to the pricing model and return rate. The demand function of absorbing pricing difference and return risk double factors is constructed to distinguish the previous researches, makes up the short- comings of previous studies. The paper can enrich and perfect the relevant theories of double channel supply chain, and provide series of useful guidance for the decision of manufacturers and retailers.
作者 张学龙 吴豆豆 王军进 刘家国 张一纯 ZHANG Xue-iong1,2 , WU Douodou1 , WANG Jun-jin1,3 ,LIU Jia-guo3 ,ZHANG Yi-chun2(1. School of Business, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China; 2. Guangxi Aviation Logistics Reserach Center, Guilin 541004, China; School of Shipping Economics and Managment, Dalian Maritime University,Dalian 116026, Chin)
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第3期59-70,共12页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71662007,71402038) 桂林航天工业学院广西航空物流中心基金资助项目(2017KFJJHKWL02) 广西研究生教育创新计划资助项目(JGY2017058)
关键词 供应链管理 双渠道供应链 定价决策 退货风险 supply chain management dual channel supply chain pricing decision return risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献92

共引文献222

同被引文献319

引证文献48

二级引证文献235

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部