置换二维码行为与财产犯罪的成立

Displacement of QR-Code and the Conviction of Property Crime

通过置换二维码非法获取财产利益的行为定性问题应当基于罪刑法定的要求,根据犯罪构成要件进行刑法上独立判断。仅通过罪名比较进行反向的排除,无法从证明上充分论证行为的构成要件该当性。置换二维码的行为虽然涉及三方关系,但并不符合三角诈骗的成立要求,虽然导致了他人的财产损害,也并不能当然地认为存在占有的移转。通过扩张占有概念,将所有财产致损行为纳入盗窃罪构成要件之中,将导致盗窃罪的口袋罪化。

The principle of mullum crimen sine lege requires that the conviction should be decided according to the penal provision independently for the criminal law.It is also not a sufficient argument for convicting an offender with justified constitutive elements by ruling out other offenders.Although there are three parties involved in the case of displacement of QR-Code for gaining property interest,it does not fulfill the requirement of the conviction of trigonometric fraud.Although the displacement of QR-Code results in property damage,it does not certainly suggest the existence of the transfer of possession.Therefore,this behavior pattern cannot be considered as theft as well.Putting the displacement of QR-Code into the category of theft crime by broadening the definition of possession will result in the boundless application of theft crime.