优化期刊评价指标体系的五维路径--对《中文核心期刊要目总览》的建议

Five-dimensional pathway for optimizing the evaluation indicator system of journals: Suggestions on A Guide to the Core Journals of China

【目的】针对《中文核心期刊要目总览》期刊评价指标体系的结构性不足,提出优化期刊评价指标体系的五维路径,以完善期刊评价体系。【方法】以期刊评价指标的属性特征为切入点,在剖析《中文核心期刊要目总览》现有评价指标维度的基础上,指出其在整体性、重要性、完整性、时效性和网络传播力5个维度的不足。【结果】在分析现有评价指标研究成果的基础上,提出通过区分不同期刊引文质量差异,深化整体性评价指标;考量重要论文的数量与强度,凸显重要论文影响力;引入反向指标,健全评价指标体系;补充时效性指标,呈现期刊生命周期;充实网络计量指标,促进引文指标与网络指标的平衡。【结论】五维路径优化期刊评价指标体系的建议有助于达到多主体、多维度、科学合理地评价期刊的目的。

[Purposes]This study aims to analyze the structural deficiencies of the evaluation indicator system of journals in A Guide to the Core Journals of China（GCJC）,put forward the five-dimensional pathway to optimize the evaluation indicator system of journals,and improve the evaluation system. [Methods]Based on the analysis of the evaluation indicator system of journals in GCJC,we combined the features of journal evaluation indicator to point out the insufficiency in five-dimensions,including integrality,importance,completeness,timeliness,and network communication ability. [Findings] Based on the analysis of the present evaluation indicator system of journals,we propose to deepen the overall evaluation indicator by distinguishing the quality differences of different citations,consider the quantity and intensity of important papers to highlight the influence of important papers,introduce backward indicators to improve the evaluation indicator system,add the timeliness indicator to present the life cycle of the journals,and enrich the network measurement indicator to promote the balance between the citation indicator and the network indicator. [Conclusions]The suggestion of a five-dimensional pathway to optimize journal evaluation indicator system is beneficial to scientifically and reasonably evaluating journals in multi-subjects and multi-dimensions.