期刊文献+

美国西北大学课程评价核心特征与主要经验 被引量:6

Typical Features and Main Experience of Curriculum Evaluation in Northwestern University of America
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国西北大学是一所著名的私立研究型大学,其卓越的教学成就赢得了极高的社会声誉。严谨的课程评价模式是保证西北大学出色教育质量的制度之一,具有鲜明典型的第四代评价特征,主要表现在:主体多元、平等协商的评价理念;内外融合、主动改进的评价制度;成果导向,学教融合的评价内容;类型多样,形式多元的评价过程。多元与融合是这一评价模式的核心特征。在评价实践中,发展性的价值取向,学习投入的内容指向,认证及专业机构的制度保障是其主要经验。美国西北大学的课程评价模式可以为我国大学课程评价改革提供一定的参考和借鉴。 The Northwestern University of America is one of the most famous private research -based universities, which has obtained the greatest honor for its excellent teaching. The institution of curriculum evaluation is of great importance in the quality assurance and has typical features of modern assessment, which are the idea of subject pluralism, the regulation of assurance and improvement, the system of learning - teaching integration and the process of diverse assessment. Development - based value, assessment key of student engagement, assurance system of accreditation and professionalism are the main experience. The practice and experience of the assessment in Northwestern University of America may be of help and guidance to the institution and practice of curriculum evaluation for Chinese universities.
作者 王朋 杨雪 WANG Peng1, YANG Xue2(1. Sehool of Educational Science, Xuzhou University of Technology, Xuzhou 221018, China; 2. School of Management, Xuzhou University of Technology, Xuzhou 221018, Chin)
出处 《贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 2018年第2期72-77,共6页 Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社科基金教育学一般课题"我国应用技术型高校制度设计与实践"(BIA140103) 徐州工程学院科研培育项目"应用型本科高校‘以学为本’质量监控体系构建与实践"(XKY2017102)的阶段性成果
关键词 课程评价 质量提升 多元 融合 curriculum evaluation quality improvement diversity integration
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献27

  • 1杨杏芳.大学教师角色扮演的哲学与社会学分析[J].贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版),2006(2):113-117. 被引量:16
  • 2蔡敏.美国著名大学教学评价的内容特征[J].外国教育研究,2006,33(6):25-28. 被引量:110
  • 3Wright, B. D.. More art than science: The postsecondary assessment movement today [EB/OL]. [2015-03-10]. http://www.docin.com/p-433921224.html.
  • 4[美]佩吉·梅基,等.博士生教育评估:改善结果导向的新标准与新模式[M].张金萍,娄枝,译.上海:上海交通大学出版社,2011:8.
  • 5Peter, T. Ewell. Establishing a campus-based assessment program[J]. New Directions for Higher Education, 1987,59: 9-24.
  • 6T. L. Strayhorn, et al. Frameworks for Assessing Learning and Development Outcomes [ Z ]. Wash- ington, DC : Council for the Advancement of standards in Higher Education, 2006: 2-3.
  • 7Association of American Colleges and Universities. College Learning for the New Global Century, A Report by National Leadership Council for Liberal Education and America' s Promise(LEAP)[R/OL]. Washington DC : Association of American Colleges and Universities, 2007: 12. [ 2014-06-12 ]. http://www. usask .ca/ipa/documents/18 College_Learning_in_the new_Global_Century .pdf.
  • 8George Kuh, et al. Knowing What Students Know and Can Do [ R/OL]. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment, 2014. [ 2014-05 - 16 ]. http://www.learningoutcomeassessment.org/documents/2013 Survey Report Final.pdf.
  • 9Mary E. Huba, Jann E. Freed. Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses:Shifting the Focus from Teaching in Learning [ M ]. Allyn & Bacon, 2000: 100-103.
  • 10Hart Research Associates. Learning and Assessment:Trends in Undergraduate Education, 2009: 4 [EB/OL]. [2015-03- 16]. http://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/2009MemberSurvey_Partl. pdf.

共引文献37

同被引文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部