期刊文献+

开胸术后不同浓度罗哌卡因胸椎旁阻滞镇痛效果的比较 被引量:10

Postoperative analgesic effects of thoracic paravertebral block with concentrations of ropivacaine in patients received thoracotomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较开胸手术后超声引导下不同浓度罗哌卡因胸椎旁阻滞的术后镇痛效果。方法选择开胸手术患者69例,采取抽签法随机分成3组(每组23例):高浓度组(H组,0.375%罗哌卡因)、中等浓度组(M组,0.25%罗哌卡因)和低浓度组(L组,0.15%罗哌卡因)。术后在超声引导下行胸椎旁阻滞,记录术后各时间点静息、咳嗽和深呼吸状态下的VAS评分。结果高浓度组和中等浓度组患者在入PACU即刻的静息VAS评分及术后6h的静息、咳嗽和深呼吸状态下的VAS评分均低于低浓度组(P〈0.05)。结论0.25%罗哌卡因20ml用于开胸手术患者术毕超声引导下胸椎旁阻滞镇痛效果良好。 Objective To compare the postoperative analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block with concentrations of ropivacaine on patients received thoracotomy. Methods Sixty-nine patients undergoing thoracotomy were randomly divided into three groups(n=23), respectively received high (group H, 0.375%), medium (group M, 0.25%), and low (group L, 0.15%) concentrations of ropivacaine. After operation, all patients received thoracic paravertebral blockade under the guidance of ultrasound. VAS during rest, coughing, and deep breath, were recorded. Results Compared with group L, the VAS during rest significantly decreased in group H and M (P〈O.05) immediately after patients entered the PACU. Furthermore, the VAS scores during rest, coughing, and deep breath in group H and M 6 h after operations declined significantly more than those in group L (P〈0.05). Conclusions Ultrasound -guided thoracic paravertebral blockade with 20 ml 0.25% ropivacaine provided satisfying postoperative analgesic effects on patients received thoracotomy.
作者 方斌 黄小静 安光惠 汪正平 Fang Bin, Huang Xiaojing, A n Guanghui, Wang Zhenping(Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai 200080, China (Fang B, Huang XJ, An GH); Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai 200072, China(Wang ZP))
出处 《国际麻醉学与复苏杂志》 CAS 2018年第2期127-131,共5页 International Journal of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation
关键词 超声引导 罗哌卡因 椎旁神经节阻滞 开胸术 术后镇痛 Ultrasound-guided Ropivacaine Paravertebral nerve block Thoracotomy Postoperative analgesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献36

  • 1Brockwqy MS, Bannistre J, McClure JH, et al. Comparison of extradural ropivacaine and bipivacaine. Br J Anaesth, 1991, 66 (1):31-37.
  • 2Davies RG, Myles PS, Graham JM. A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epidural blockade for thoracotomy--a systematic review and recta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth, 2006,96 (4) : 418-426.
  • 3Karmakar MK. Thoracic paravertebral block. Anesthesiology, 2001, 95(3); 771-780.
  • 4Eason MJ. Paravertebral thoracic block--a reappraisal. Anaesthesia, 1979, 34(7) :638-642.
  • 5柏林.胸椎旁间隙阻滞在儿科领域的应用[硕士学位论文].重庆:重庆医科大学,2003.
  • 6Naja Z, LSnnqvist PA. Somatic paravertebral nerve blockade: incidence of failed block and complications. Anaesthesia, 2001, 56(12) : 1184-1188.
  • 7Feldman HS, Arthur RG, Covino BG. Comparative systemic toxicity of convulsant and supraconvulsant doses of intravenous ropivacaine, bupivacaine and lidocaine in the conscious dog. Anesth Analg, 1989, 69(6) :794-801.
  • 8Schnabel A, Reichl SU, Kranke P, et al. Efficacy and safety of paravertebral blocks in breast surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth, 2010, 105 (6) : 842-852.
  • 9Cowie B, MeGlade D, Ivanusic J, et al. Uhrasound guided thoracic paravertebral blockade: a cadaveric study, Anesth Analg, 2010, 110 (6): 1735-1749.
  • 10Rukewe A, Fatiregun A, Ademola AF, et al. Single-shotlamina technique of paravertebral block as an adjunct to gen eral anesthesia for modified radical mastectomy. Niger J Clin Pract, 2015,18 (3) :429-431.

共引文献70

同被引文献93

引证文献10

二级引证文献94

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部