期刊文献+

经验性决策:不完备信息条件下的搜索与学习 被引量:3

Experience-based Decisions:Exploring and Learning under Incomplete Information Conditions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 经验性决策是个体基于经验做出的决策,其特点表现为信息不完备、经验依赖和重复动态。研究发现,经验性决策情境下个体的行为规律与描述性决策情境下存在显著差异,其根源是内在认知过程的不同,主要体现在信息搜索(内外部)和经验学习两方面。在经验性决策过程的外部信息搜索中,个体通常依赖于小样本进行决策;而工作记忆的有限性又导致了内部信息搜索的"近因效应";同时,搜索规则也会受到信息本身及信息搜索者特点的影响。基于反馈的经验学习在经验性决策过程中扮演着重要角色,据此发展出的学习模型具备一定的解释力。未来研究应重点考察"描述-经验差异"的深层原因,扩展现有的实验范式,探讨经验性决策的核心心理机制,以及构建经验性决策模型等。 Experience-based decisions refer to decisions made by individuals'experience,with incomplete information,reliance on experience and repetition.Research evidences have shown that people behave differently in description-based decision and experience-based decision,resulting in a systematic and robust"description of experience gap".The difference of internal cognitive processes between these two kinds of decisions could explain the gap.This paper aims to clarify how information exploring and experience learning as two important cognitive processes in experience-based decision.In experience-based decision,people search information both externally and internally.In external information exporing,people tend to rely on small samples.The internal information search is highly restricted by individual's working memory capacity.The adoption of exploring rule is influenced by several factors.Learning on feedbacks plays an important role in experience-based decision.A few learning models have been developed to better understand this process.Possible directions for future research may include:The expansion of experiment paradigms and decision scenarios,especially more realistic,more universal and more dynamic designs;The study of key cognitive processes and mental mechanisms during the decision-making process,such as role of emotion,attention and mental representation;The construction,testing and constant adjustment of modeling.
作者 李虹 付丽莎 LI Hong, FU Li-sha(Department of Psychology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, PR)
出处 《西北师大学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第2期105-114,共10页 Journal of Northwest Normal University(Social Sciences)
基金 北京市社会科学基金一般项目"北京市流动儿童的微观社会融合:心理与行为决策特点 影响因素与作用机制"(14SHB014)
关键词 描述性决策 经验性决策 认知过程 信息搜索 经验学习 description-based decisions experience-based decisions cognitive processes information search experience learning
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献92

  • 1Barron, G., & Erev, I. (2003). Small feedback-based decisions and their limited correspondence to description-based decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 215-233.
  • 2Barron, G., & Yechiam, E. (2009). The coexistence of overestimation and underweighting of rare events and the contingent recency effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 447-460.
  • 3Camilleri, A. R., & Newell, B. R. (2009a). Within-subject preference reversals in description- and experience-based choice. In N. Taatgen, J. van Rijn, J. Nerbonne, & L. Schomaker (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 449-454). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • 4Camilleri, A. R., & Newell, B. R. (2009b). The role of representation in experience-based choice. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(7), 518-529.
  • 5Erev, I., Glozman, I., & Hertwig, R. (2008). What impacts the impact of rare events. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 36. 153-177.
  • 6Fox, C. R., & Hadar, L. (2006). "Decisions from experience"=sampling error + prospect theory: Reconsidering Hertwig, Barron, Weber & Erev (2004). Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 159-161.
  • 7Fox, C. R., & Tversky, A. (1998). A belief-based account of decision under uncertainty. Management Science, 44, 879-895.
  • 8Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102, 684-704.
  • 9Hadar, L,, & Fox, C. R. (2009). Information asymmetry in decision from description versus decision from experience. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 317-325.
  • 10Hau, R., Pleskac, T. J., & Hertwig, R. (2010). Decisions from experience and statistical probabilities: Why they trigger different choices than a priori probabilities. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 46-68.

共引文献22

同被引文献41

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部