期刊文献+

机场热点时空分布特征及运行风险评价 被引量:8

Research on spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of airport hotspots and airport operational risk assessment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为研究大型机场航空器地面滑行冲突风险,提出一种基于机场热点时空分布特征的机场机动区运行风险评价方法。首先,以中南地区某机场为例,将场监雷达数据按每3 h分段,分别识别各时间段的机场热点,分析其时空分布特征;然后,基于热点发生的可能性和后果的严重性,构建考虑航空器冲突架次比、冲突可能性、冲突持续时间、冲突级别的机场热点风险评价模型,依据现有机场热点风险等级评价标准,评价该机场的热点风险等级。结果表明:该机场02号跑道运行风险高于20号跑道;02号跑道起降时,12:00—15:00点的机场热点风险最高;20号跑道起降时,9:00—12:00点机场热点的风险较高,与该机场实际运行情况基本相符。 In order to study the risk of aircraft taxiing conflicts in large airports,a method was worked out for evaluating the operational risk of airport maneuvering area based on the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of airport hotspots. Firstly,an airport in the south-central region of China was taken as an example,whose aerodrome surveillance radar data was divided into several 3 hours long segments,and airport hotspots were identified for the segments,and their spatial and temporal distribution characteristics were analyzed. Then a risk assessment model was built,in which the possibility of hotspots formation,severity of the consequence of the recognized hotspots,conflict sortie ratio of aircrafts,level of conflict possibility,duration of conflict and conflict level were considered. Based on the existing risk level assessment standards,the risk levels of the airport hotspots were evaluated. According to the results,risk levels of airport hotspots are affected by airport traffic flow and operational modes of runway. The operational risk of runway 02 is higher than that of runway 20. If the runway 02 is used for landing or taking-off,the highest risk level will be reached in the segment of 12: 00-15: 00. And if the runway 20 isused,the risk level of hotspots is relatively high in the segment of 9: 00-12: 00. The results conform with the reality of the airport.
作者 夏正洪 万健 朱新平 XIA Zhenghong1, WAN Jian2 ,ZHU Xinping1(1 School of Air Traffic Control, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan Sichuan 618307, China ;2 China Academy of Civil Aviation Science and Technology, Beijing 100028, Chin)
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第1期93-98,共6页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金委员会与中国民用航空联合项目资助(U1433126,U1733105) 民航科技项目重大专项(MHRD20150102)
关键词 机场热点 时空分布特征 风险评价 地面交通流 冲突架次比 冲突持续时间 risk evaluation airport hotspots spatial and temporal distribution characteristics surface traffic flow conflict sortie ratio of aircrafts duration of conflict
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献68

  • 1王绍平,崔德光.空中交通控制的冲突探测算法[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2004,44(10):1368-1371. 被引量:16
  • 2中国民用航空局航空安全办公室,中国民航科学技术研究院.中国民航不安全事件统计分析报告[R],2011.
  • 3International Civil Aviation Organization. Procedures for Air Navigation Services-Air Traffic Management, Doc 4444 - ATM/501 [ M]. Montreal : International Civil Aviation Organization, 2007 : 1 - 9.
  • 4International Civil Aviation Organization. Manual on the Prevention of Runway Incursions (Doc9870 AN/463)[M]. Montreal : International Civil Aviation Organization, First Edition ,2006:3 - 20.
  • 5Wayne Rosenkrans. Hot spot intelligence[J].Aero Safety World,2010(5) :21 -23.
  • 6中国民用航空局.国内航空资料汇编[G],2012.1.
  • 7kwok-suen Ng, Wing-tat Hung, Wing-gun Wong. An algorithm for assessing the risk of traffic accident [J]. Journal of Safety Research,2002,33 (3) : 387 - 410.
  • 8Andrew P,Tarko, Mayank Kanodia. Effective and fair identification of hazardous locations[ C ]. Transportation Research Board,2004:25 - 29.
  • 9Hawkins F H. Human factors in flight[M]. Brookfield:VT: Ashgate, 1993:1 -3.
  • 10Shappell S, Detwiler C, Holcomb K, et al. Human error and commercial aviation accidents : an analysis using the human factors analysis and classification system[J]. Human Factors, 2007, 49(2): 227 -242.

共引文献83

同被引文献72

引证文献8

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部