摘要
对监察机关调查的证据材料不能一概在诉讼中作为证据使用,应区分实物证据和言词证据,对于言词证据需进行证据“转化”。监察机关调查的证据材料进入诉讼后仍应适用非法证据排除规则进行合法性事查,录音录像资料应随案移送,监察人员在必要时亦应出庭“说明情况”,对在看守所留置的被调查人应实行调查终结前讯问合法性核查、提讯登记、身体检查和值班律师法律帮助等制度。对被调查人供述亦应适用重复性供述排除规则,对监察机关自行排除的非法证据不得随案移送。
All the evidences for investigation by the supervisory organ cannot be used as evidences in the lawsuit. It shall distinguish the physical evidences from the verbal evidences, and verbal evidences shall be transformed. Evidences shall still be applicable to the exelusionary rule of legality review, and the audio and video data shall be transferred together with the case, and the supervisory personnel shall be in court "to ex- plain the situations" when necessary. The indwelling in the guard of the respondents shall be implemented be- fore the end of the investigation and interrogation validity verification, with the need for hearing registration, physical examination, and the duty lawyer legal help system. Repeated confession exclusionary rules shall also be applied to the confession of the investigator, and the illegal evidences excluded by the supervisory organ shall not be transferred to the case.
作者
韩旭
HAN Xu(School of Law, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610225, Chin)
出处
《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第2期91-99,共9页
Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词
监察委员会
调查
证据材料
司法使用
the Supervisory Committee
investigation
evidence materials
the judicial use