战国兵器命名及相关问题两则

Naming of Weaponry of the Warring States Period and Two Related Issues

《殷周金文集成》11914号距末上的两字,以往学者在字形释读上有误,通过观察最新的照片,这两个字应当释作"圣守","圣"字可以通假作"亭",那么"圣守"就应读作"亭守",按照器物命名惯例,这件器物当改称作"圣守"距末或"亭守"距末。《文物》2011年第9期刊布的一件楚国铜矛,发表者未能正确释读出器主名,只能释读作"竞□"。然而从发表的图片可知,器主的名字当是从"力"从"又"从"畏"声的一个字。典籍中"竞"可以通假作"景","畏"可以通假作"翠",因此,这件铜戈的器主乃是战国有名的楚国将军"景翠",这件铜戈当改称为"景翠矛"。

The two characters inscribed on the jumo collected in Ji Cheng （No. 11914） was interpreted mistakenly in the previous studies. According to the latest photographs, the two characters should be interpreted as [圣守] and the character [圣] can be interchanged with [亭]. Therefore, [亭守] （ Shengshou ） should be read as ＂Tingshou＂ and this jumo should be referred to as ＂Shengshou＂ or ＂Tingshou （亭守）＂ jumo in accordance with the naming convention of implements. The bronze spear of Chu State published in No. 9th Cultural Relics in 2011, the owner＇s name was only interpreted as ＂Jing （竟）D＂. However, judging from the published photographs, the owner＇s name should be made up of the components ＂Y/＂ and ＂Y,.＂ and read as ＂Wei＂. In the ancient books and records, the characters ＂竞＂ and ＂景＂ along with＂畏＂and＂翠＇can be interchangeable. Therefore, the owner of this bronze spear should be ＂~＇; a famous general of the Chu State in the Warring States Period. Accordingly, the bronze spear can be termed ＂Jingcui spear （景翠矛）＂.