期刊文献+

《汉画解读》中收录的拓片是否可信 被引量:1

Authenticity of the Rubbings in Interpretation on Han Dynasty Stone Carvings
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文就《汉画解读》一书中收录的一百幅汉画拓片,用举证的方式进行了分析解读。本文特别是对拓片中有明显常识性错误的,如早期造纸工艺流程和设备,套用了潘吉星先生研究造纸论文中的插图;收录了从未见过的"铸钱图";不近情理的车马结构;汉代的兵器,特别是短兵器刀的形制特征、射远武器弓箭的使用方法;汉代人日常生活中的跪和坐的姿态;酒具的组合和使用情况;汉代的服饰特征和着装打扮以及纪年法和干支记日等等,都进行了细致的分析,证明这些拓片为伪造,以提醒读者,不要被蒙蔽。 This paper gives the interpretation and illustration of the one hundred rubbings collected in Interpretation on Han Dynasty Stone Carvings. Especially, the author argues the obvious commonsense mistakes of the rubbings. For example, in this book the illustrations about the technological process and the equipment of papermaking are copied from Pan Jixing's paper on the papermaking. The "Coining Picture" never appeared in any other literature. The paper also makes an intensive analysis on the illogical chariot structure, the characteristics of knife and some other weapons, the usage of bow and arrow, the posture of kneeling and sitting, the composition and use of wine vessels, dressing, costumes and accessories in Han dynasty, chronology and the days designated by the heavenly stems and earthly branches and so on. It's proved that these rubbings are faked and the current author aims at reminding the readers to be away from deception.
作者 孙机
机构地区 中国国家博物馆
出处 《中国国家博物馆馆刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第3期79-88,共10页 Journal of National Museum of China
关键词 汉画解读 拓片 冯其庸 Interpretation on Han Dynasty Stone Carvings rubbing Feng Qiyong
  • 相关文献

共引文献13

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部