期刊文献+

基于消费责任制的碳排放核算及全球环境压力 被引量:25

Global carbon emissions and its environmental impact analysis based on a consumption accounting principle
原文传递
导出
摘要 因区域间贸易而转移的碳排放对于全球各个国家或者地区的碳排放核算及其减排责任划分具有重要而深远的影响。通过构建多区域投入产出分析模型和基于扩展的STIRPAT模型,本文核算了全球39个主要国家基于消费责任制的碳排放,并在此基础上深入探讨了全球环境压力的影响因素问题。研究发现:首先,从以净流出为主的中国和俄罗斯来看,尽管贸易给这些地区带来了大量的资源,但随之会产生严重的区域生态环境问题。而对于美国和欧盟等地区来说,这些国家或者地区通过全球贸易规避了大量的碳减排责任。此外,在全球贸易中,区域净流出的贸易隐含碳排放越小,基于消费责任制核算的区域碳排放量就越大,故而在全球减排目标分配中承担的减排任务也需相应地增加。全球贸易隐含碳排放净流出量较大的地区主要位于亚洲和东欧等地,而净流出量最小的地区主要是以西欧和北美等高度发达的经济体为主。其次,就基于消费责任制核算下的全球环境压力而言,人口因素和富裕程度是导致全球环境压力不断增加的两个重要因素,而提高生产技术水平以及逐渐提高清洁能源在总能源消费中的比重是推动全球节能减排、缓解全球环境压力的有效途径。 Embodied carbon emissions in international trade plays a crucial role in shaping regional commitments towards emission reduction in the context of global climate change and greenhouse gas emission policy. Based on the multi-region input-output analytical framework and the stochastic impacts by regression on population, affluence and technology(STIRPAT)model, this paper analyzes the embodiment of global emissions in trade, so as to explore the characteristics of global carbon emissions under a consumption accounting principle for 39 countries from 1995 to 2011, and investigates the determinants of the embodied emissions in global trade based on an extended STIRPAT model. One finding from this study is that some countries like China and Russia are characterized by the highest net outflow of embodied emissions in trade, while other regions in the world provide strong support for their economic growth through thick trade relationships, and more importantly, comparative advantages are also obtained by their industries associated with trades. Under the production-based accounting principle, these countries like China and Russia have also been accountable for a large volume of emissions embodied in global trade, and thus would face huge pressures to curtail carbon emissions, which, in turn, may also impede the local economic development. Moreover, the lower the net carbon emissions embodied in regional trade, the higher the carbon emissions under a consumption accounting principle. Therefore, the relevant countries should bear greater emissions reduction responsibilities from the perspective of the production-based accounting principle in the context of global climate policy. Additionally, the analysis results show that a larger deal of net carbon emissions embodied in global trade are mainly from Asia and Eastern Europe, while a smaller amount of net carbon emissions embodied in global trade are primarily found in highly economically developed regions like Western Europe and Northern America.Another important finding is that, for environmental impact analysis regarding the corresponding influencing factors, the increase of carbon emissions embodied in global trade would be primarily caused by population and economic development level. For wealthy countries or regions such as the USA and the EU, via trade relations with their main trading partners, their environmental impacts, particularly carbon emissions associated with their consumption, may be transferred to other regions. On that basis, facing severe pressures to curb carbon emissions embodied in international trade in climate policy, these regions should take proactive initiatives like carrying out technology transfer and/or providing financial aid to improve notably other developing countries' production technology. In addition, in order to reduce the impact of trade on the emissions of global economies on global environment, the increase in the overall share of clean energy in the energy consumption structure and energy efficiency improvement should be also an effective policy option.
作者 钟章奇 姜磊 何凌云 王铮 柏玲 ZHONG Zhangqi1, JIANG Lei1,2, HE Lingyun3, WANG Zheng4, 5, BAI Ling6(1. School of Economics, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China; 2. College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China; 3. School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China; 4. Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science, East China Normal University, Ministry of Education, Shanghai 200241, China; 5. Institute of Policy and Management, CAS, Beijing 100080, China; 6. School of Economics and Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, Chin)
出处 《地理学报》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第3期442-459,共18页 Acta Geographica Sinica
基金 浙江省社科规划课题(18NDJC149YB) 国家自然科学基金项目(71742001 41761021) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(17YJC790061)~~
关键词 贸易隐含碳 投入产出分析 环境压力 能源结构 全球 emissions embodied in trade input-output analysis environmental impact energy structure global
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献215

共引文献576

同被引文献392

引证文献25

二级引证文献176

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部