期刊文献+

电针配合康复训练对脑卒中后肩痛患者上肢运动功能恢复的影响 被引量:8

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察电针配合康复治疗对脑卒中后肩痛患者上肢运动功能的影响,同时探讨解决卒中后肩痛的有效评价方法。方法:选取60例脑卒中后肩痛住院患者随机分为康复组、药物配合康复组和电针配合康复组,采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、Fugl-Meyer上肢运动功能评分(UE-FMA)、运动功能状态量表(MSS)、WOLF运动功能测试评定标准(WMFT)、改良Barthel指数(MBI)对所有患者治疗前、治疗2周后及治疗4周后进行肩痛程度、上肢运动功能及日常生活的评价。结果:治疗前3组患者在VAS、UEFMA、MSS、WOLF及MBI方面组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);经治疗3种治疗方法均能缓解肩痛,并提升患者上肢运动功能,治疗2周电针配合康复组及药物配合康复组优于单纯康复组(P<0.01),而电针配合康复组及药物配合康复组组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗4周后,电针配合康复组疗效仍优于单纯康复组,组间比较有显著性差异(P<0.01),并且在UE-FMA方面电针配合康复组与药物配合康复组比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),在WMFT方面电针配合康复组与药物配合康复组比较,具有显著性差异(P<0.01),而在MSS及MBI方面电针配合康复组与药物配合康复组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:电针配合康复治疗能够缓解卒中后肩痛患者的疼痛程度,并且可以改善患者的上肢运动功能。
出处 《中国中医药科技》 CAS 2018年第2期239-241,共3页 Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Science and Technology
基金 浙江省医药卫生科研项目(2015ZHB018)
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献67

  • 1柳卫民,郑丽芳,梅元武.脑卒中患者生活质量的评估及其影响因素[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(29):142-144. 被引量:15
  • 2Shah S,Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel IndeX for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol, 1989,42:703-709.
  • 3Eakin P, Baird H. The Community Dependency Index:a standardized assessment of need and measure of outcome for community occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther, 1995,58 : 17-22.
  • 4Hachisuka K, Ogata H, Ohkkuma H, et al. Test-retest and inter-method reliability of the self-rating Barthel Index. Clin Rehabil, 1997,11 : 28 -35.
  • 5Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, et al. Comprehensive assessment of activities of daily living in stroke. The copenhagen strokes study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1997,78:161-165.
  • 6Kwon S,Hartzema AG,Duncan PW,et al. Disability measures in stroke: relationship among the Barthel Index, the functional independence measure and the modified Rankin scale. Stroke, 2004, 35: 918-923.
  • 7Dennis W, Pamela W, Sue ML. Comparison of responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the motor component of the functional measure in stroke,the impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol,2002,55:922-928.
  • 8Gosman-Hedstrom G, Svensson E. Parallel reliability of the functional independence measure and the Barthel ADL index. Disabil Rehabil, 2000,22:702-715.
  • 9Wallace D, Duncan PW, Lai SM. Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the motor component of the functional independence measure in stroke :the impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol,2002,5:922-928.
  • 10Van Bennekom CAM ,Jelles F, Lankhorst GJ, et al. Responsiveness of the rehabilitation activities profile and the Barthe Index. J Clin Epidemiol, 1996,49:39-44.

共引文献33780

同被引文献163

引证文献8

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部