期刊文献+

明代折漕规模及漕粮折价确立原则考 被引量:12

The Research on the Scale of Converting Tribute Grain to Silver and the Principles of Setting Its Converted Price During the Ming Dynasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 明代漕粮的改折分为永折和临时改折两种。成化以来,历年折漕数额起伏不定。据统计,自正德十六年至天启六年年均折漕为88万石,占整个漕粮的22%,其中正德十六年至嘉靖二十五年、万历四年至万历二十八年为两个折漕高峰时段,年均折漕分别达110万石、126万石。明代漕粮折价的确立原则非常复杂;在南方,依据时间先后顺序主要有:(正米+正耗)×基准价=漕粮折价、(正米+随船耗米)×基准价=漕粮折价、(正米+所有耗米)×基准价=漕粮折价等三种模式;而在北方,主要"按领价折漕"。将本色运纳所需的运输、交兑、上仓等各种费用转化为税粮折价,成为了明代费改税的主要方式和途径,为政府财政收入的不断增加提供机会。而明代漕粮受困于其具有稳定京师粮价、保障京师粮食供应、保障国家粮食战略贮备等四种特殊功能,所以货币化的规模难以进一步拓展。 The converted tribute grain to silver existed in two forms in the Ming Dynasty,which were permanent converting and temporary converting.Since the reign of Chenghua,the amount of converted tribute grain paid in silver had been fluctuated.During this period,Zhengde 16 years to Jiajing 25 years and Wanli 4 years to 28 years were the two highest stages,which obtained the average amounts as 1.1 and 1.26 million Dan respectively.During Zhengde 16 years to Tianqi 6 years,the amount of silver paid tribute grain was 880 thousand Dan per year,which accounted for 22 percent in the whole amount of the tribute grain.To set the grains converted silver price,the principles were extremely complex in the Ming Dynasty.In the south of China,there were three models of setting the converted price.According to time order,firstly,the converted price was made by standard price multiplied by the amount of rated grain tax and the rated wastage,and then it was counted by standard price multiplied by the amount of rated grain tax and the transported loss,and at last it was set by standard price multiplied by the quantity of rated grain tax and all of the additional wastage.However,in Northern China,the tribute grains converted price was mainly decided by Lingjia.Whats more,except the four models talked above,there were various patterns interspersed at the same time.Moreover,transforming the tribute grain to converted silver price,which included various expenses on the transported grain,such as transportation,transaction,storehouse payment and so on,had become the dominating way of which replaced the fee by tax in paying transported grain tax during the Ming Dynasty.However,the monetization of the tribute grain was locked by the effect on stabilizing the grain price in the capital and other four functions.Thus,the scale of converting tribute grain to silver was limited in the Ming Dynasty.
作者 胡铁球
出处 《清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第2期117-138,共22页 Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“比限、票单与明清州县赋役体制的演变”(14BZS027)
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献159

  • 1鲍彦邦.明代漕粮运费的派征及其重负[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),1995,17(2):61-71. 被引量:5
  • 2任源祥.《漕运议》,载贺长龄等编.《清经世文编》卷46,北京:中华书局,1992年.
  • 3席书,朱家相.《漕船志》卷六《法例》.
  • 4胡铁球.《明清歇家研究》.
  • 5梁材:《复议节财用疏》,《皇明经世文编》卷102,第919页.
  • 6马森:《明会计以预远图疏》,载陈子龙等编:《明经世文编》卷298,第3130页.
  • 7拙作.《明代漕粮制度》,载《平准学刊》,第四辑下册,光明日报出版社,一九八九年.
  • 8《明英宗实录》卷一五四,正统十二年五月甲辰,第3014页.
  • 9顾炎武.《天下郡国利病书》原编第7册《常镇·武进县志》,《续修四库全书》第595册,第4页.
  • 10陆世仪.《桴亭先生诗文集》文集卷五《漕兑揭》,见《清代诗文集汇编》第36册,上海:上海古籍出版社,2010年,第72页.

共引文献20

引证文献12

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部