期刊文献+

改良侧壁开窗式上颌窦底提升术治疗上颌后牙区缺牙伴重度骨萎缩患者临床观察 被引量:6

Application of modified lateral window for maxillary sinus floor augmentation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评估改良侧壁开窗式上颌窦底提升术治疗上颌后牙区缺牙伴重度骨萎缩患者的疗效。方法:选择2012年6月至2014年10月于浙江大学医学院附属口腔医院就诊的上颌后牙区缺牙伴重度骨萎缩患者5 5例,均接受改良侧壁开窗式上颌窦底提升术。在上颌窦侧壁开窗操作中,将常规的6~8 mm垂直高度的卵圆形骨窗改良为4~5 mm的沟槽状骨窗,并通过改良骨窗建立的操作通道充分剥离上颌窦底黏膜,于黏膜下方置入适量大颗粒Bio-Oss骨粉。统计种植体存活率,测量骨粉垂直高度、体积并计算其吸收率,记录相关并发症。结果:同期植入86颗种植体,种植体累计存活率为97.67%(基于种植体分析)和96.36%(基于患者分析)。术前剩余骨高度为(4.7±2.6)mm,宽度为(8.4±2.7)mm。术后即刻种植位点骨高度为(16.1±2.5)mm,修复时骨高度为(16.2±2.2)mm,术后1年和2年的骨高度分别为(14.9±2.5)mm和(13.6±2.6)mm。术后即刻骨粉高度为(10.6±2.8)mm,体积为(1569±745)mm^3;术后半年内骨粉高度吸收率为3.79%,体积吸收率为7.87%;术后1年时骨粉高度累计吸收率为6.63%,体积累计吸收率为10.89%;术后2年时骨粉高度累计吸收率为7.58%,体积累计吸收率为15.26%。5例患者术中发生窦底黏膜小穿孔,均使用Bio-Gide胶原膜成功修复。结论:改良侧壁开窗式上颌窦底提升术治疗上颌后牙区缺牙伴重度骨萎缩患者有较高的种植体存活率、良好的骨粉稳定性以及较低的并发症发生率,是一种安全可靠并且创伤较小的种植骨增量手段。 Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of modified lateral window for maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA). Methods: Fifty-five patients who visited the Stomatology Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine between June 2012 and October 2014 were enrolled in the study. Patients underwent MSFA with Bio-Oss grafts based on modified access window. During the operation the vertical height of the bony window was reduced from 6 - 8 mm of conventional oval window to 4 -5 mm of slot-shaped window. The sinus membrane was detached completely via the lateral access and large particle Bio-Oss graft was placed in the sub- mueosal space. The implant survival, graft height, graft volume and resorption rates were measured. Intra-op and post-op complications were recorded. Results: There were 86 implants inserted. The 2 -4 year cumulative survival rates were 97.67% by implant-based analysis and 96.36% by patient-based analysis. The residual bone height was (4.7 ±2.6) mm and bone width was (8.4±2.7) mm. The bone height of implantation site immediately after operation was ( 16. 1 ±2.5 ) mm and it was ( 16.2±2.2) mm at restoration. The bone heights at 1 and 2 years after operation were ( 14.9 ± 2.5) nun and (13.6±2.6) mm, respectively. The graft height was (10.6 ±2.8) mm and the graft volume was (1569±745 ) mm3immediately after operation. The resorption rate of graft height 6 months after operation was 3.79% and that of graft volume was 7.87%. The 1-year accumulative resorption rate of graft height was 6.63% and that of graft volume was 10.89%. The 2-year accumulative resorption rate of graft height was 7.58% and that of graft volume was 15.26%. Small membrane perforation during MSFA was observed in 5 cases and all were successfully repaired by a collagen Bio-Gide membrane. Conclusion: The modified lateral technique obtains high implant survival rate, excellent graft stability and low complication rate at 2 -4 year clinical follow-up, indicating that it is a safe, predictable and minimally invasive surgical method for severe atrophic maxillary posterior dentition.
作者 陆薇 林梦娜 赵士芳 王慧明 何福明 LU Wei1, LIN Mengna2, ZHAO Shifang2, WANG Huiming2, HE Fuming2(1. Department of Periodontology, Stomatology Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310006, China; 2. Department of Implantology, Stomatology Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310006, Chin)
出处 《浙江大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第6期630-636,共7页 Journal of Zhejiang University(Medical Sciences)
基金 国家自然科学基金(81470780 31670970) 国家卫生和计划生育委员会科研基金(浙江省部共建项目)(WKJZJ-1524) 浙江省科学技术厅公益技术应用研究计划(2015C33161)
关键词 上颌窦/外科学 生物膜 骨代用品/治疗应用 明胶海绵 吸收性/治 疗应用 骨移植/方法 牙种植 治疗结果 随访研究 Maxillary sinus/surgery Biofilms Bone substitutes/therapeutic use Gelatin sponge, absorbable/therapeutic use Bone transplantation/methods Dentalimplantation Treatment outcome Follow-up studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献20

  • 1Wallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review [ J ]. Ann Periodontol,2003,8 ( 1 ) :328 - 343.
  • 2Tatum OH. Maxillary sinus grafting for endosseous implants [ R ]. Birmingham: Annual Meeting of the Alabama Implant Study Group, 1977.
  • 3Tatum OH, Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions [ J]. Dent Clin North Am,1986,30(2) :207 -229.
  • 4Summers RB. The osteotome technique : Part 3-Less invasive meth- ods of elevating the sinus floor[ J]. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 1994,15(6) :698 -708.
  • 5Nkenke E,Stelzle F. Clinical outcomes of sinus floor augmentation for implant placement using autogenous bone or bone substitutes : A systematic review [ J ]. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009,20 ( suppl4) :124 - 133.
  • 6Wallace SS, Mazor Z, Froum S.j,et al. Schneiderian membrane per- foration rate during sinus elevation using piezosurgery:Clinical re- suits of 100 consecutive cases[ J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent,2007,27:413 - 419.
  • 7Toscano NJ,Holtzclaw D,Rosen PS. The effect of piezoelectric use on open sinus lift perforation :a retrospective evaluation of 56 con- secutively treated cases from private practices [J]. J Periodonto, 2010,81(1) :167 - 171.
  • 8Solar P, Geyerhofer U,Traxler H,et al. Blood supply to the maxil- lazy sinus relevant to sinus floor elevation procedures[J]. Clin O- ral Implants Res, 1999,10 ( 1 ) :34 - 44.
  • 9Del Fabbro M,Rosano G,Taschieri S. Implant survival rates after maxillary sinus augmentation [ J]. Eur J Oral Sci,2008,116 (6) : 497 - 506.
  • 10Pjetursson BE,Tan WC,Zwahlen M,et al. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation [ J ]. J Clin Periodontal, 2008,35 ( s8 ) :216 - 240.

同被引文献38

引证文献6

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部