期刊文献+

Neurocognitive Graphs of First-Episode Schizophrenia and Major Depression Based on Cognitive Features 被引量:6

Neurocognitive Graphs of First-Episode Schizophrenia and Major Depression Based on Cognitive Features
原文传递
导出
摘要 Neurocognitive deficits are frequently observed in patients with schizophrenia and major depressive disorder(MDD). The relations between cognitive features may be represented by neurocognitive graphs based on cognitive features, modeled as Gaussian Markov random fields. However, it is unclear whether it is possible to differentiate between phenotypic patterns associated with the differential diagnosis of schizophrenia and depression using this neurocognitive graph approach. In this study, we enrolled 215 first-episode patients with schizophrenia(FES), 125 with MDD, and 237 demographically-matched healthy controls(HCs). The cognitive performance of all participants was evaluated using a battery of neurocognitive tests. The graphical LASSO model was trained with aone-vs-one scenario to learn the conditional independent structure of neurocognitive features of each group. Participants in the holdout dataset were classified into different groups with the highest likelihood. A partial correlation matrix was transformed from the graphical model to further explore the neurocognitive graph for each group. The classification approach identified the diagnostic class for individuals with an average accuracy of 73.41% for FES vs HC, 67.07% for MDD vs HC, and 59.48% for FES vs MDD. Both of the neurocognitive graphs for FES and MDD had more connections and higher node centrality than those for HC. The neurocognitive graph for FES was less sparse and had more connections than that for MDD.Thus, neurocognitive graphs based on cognitive features are promising for describing endophenotypes that may discriminate schizophrenia from depression. Neurocognitive deficits are frequently observed in patients with schizophrenia and major depressive disorder(MDD). The relations between cognitive features may be represented by neurocognitive graphs based on cognitive features, modeled as Gaussian Markov random fields. However, it is unclear whether it is possible to differentiate between phenotypic patterns associated with the differential diagnosis of schizophrenia and depression using this neurocognitive graph approach. In this study, we enrolled 215 first-episode patients with schizophrenia(FES), 125 with MDD, and 237 demographically-matched healthy controls(HCs). The cognitive performance of all participants was evaluated using a battery of neurocognitive tests. The graphical LASSO model was trained with aone-vs-one scenario to learn the conditional independent structure of neurocognitive features of each group. Participants in the holdout dataset were classified into different groups with the highest likelihood. A partial correlation matrix was transformed from the graphical model to further explore the neurocognitive graph for each group. The classification approach identified the diagnostic class for individuals with an average accuracy of 73.41% for FES vs HC, 67.07% for MDD vs HC, and 59.48% for FES vs MDD. Both of the neurocognitive graphs for FES and MDD had more connections and higher node centrality than those for HC. The neurocognitive graph for FES was less sparse and had more connections than that for MDD.Thus, neurocognitive graphs based on cognitive features are promising for describing endophenotypes that may discriminate schizophrenia from depression.
出处 《Neuroscience Bulletin》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2018年第2期312-320,共9页 神经科学通报(英文版)
基金 funded by National Nature Science Foundation of China Key Projects(81130024,91332205,and 81630030) the National Key Technology R&D Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China(2016YFC0904300) the National Natural Science Foundation of China/Research Grants Council of Hong Kong Joint Research Scheme(8141101084) the Natural Science Foundation of China(8157051859) the Sichuan Science&Technology Department(2015JY0173) the Canadian Institutes of Health Research,Alberta Innovates:Centre for Machine Learning the Canadian Depression Research&Intervention Network
关键词 SCHIZOPHRENIA Major depressive disorder NEUROCOGNITION Neurocognitive graph Graphical LASSO Schizophrenia Major depressive disorder Neurocognition Neurocognitive graph Graphical LASSO
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献132

  • 1Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of dsm-iv disorders in the national comorbidity survey replica- tion. Archives of General Psychiatry 2005, 62: 593-602.
  • 2Greenberg PE, Fournier AA, Sisitsky T, Pike CT, Kessler RC. The economic burden of adults with major depressive disorder in the United States (2005 and 2010). J Clin Psychiatry 2015, 76: 155-162.
  • 3Global Burden of Disease Study C. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2015, 386: 743-800.
  • 4Thompson SM, Kallarackal AJ, Kvarta MD, Van Dyke AM, LeGates TA, Cai X. An excitatory synapse hypothesis of depression. Trends Neurosci 2015, 38: 279-294.
  • 5Gartlehner G, Hansen RA, Morgan LC, Thaler K, Lux L, Van Noord M, et al. Comparative benefits and harms of second- generation antidepressants for treating major depressive disor- der: an updated meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2011, 155: 772-785.
  • 6Gaynes BN, Warden D, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, Fava M, Rush AJ. What did STAR*D teach us? Results from a large- scale, practical, clinical trial for patients with depression. Psy- chiatr Serv 2009, 60: 1439-1445.
  • 7Fowler AM. A molecular approach to breast imaging. J Nucl Med 2014, 55: 177-180.
  • 8Weissleder R, Mahmood U. Molecular imaging. Radiology 2001, 219: 316-333.
  • 9James ML, Gambhir SS. A molecular imaging primer: modali- ties, imaging agents, and applications. Physiol Rev 2012, 92: 897-965.
  • 10Blamire AM. The technology of MRI-the next 10 years? Br J Radiol 2008, 81: 601-617.

共引文献30

同被引文献33

引证文献6

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部