期刊文献+

航天器碰撞解体模型分析比较 被引量:3

Comparison and Analysis on Spacecraft Collision Breakup Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对航天器空间碰撞解体碎片对在轨航天器造成威胁的问题,对空间航天器撞击解体模型进行分析比较。对目前国内外的航天器空间碰撞解体模型做了综述,并介绍3种国内外具有代表性的空间航天器撞击解体模型——Battelle撞击解体模型、NASA标准模型以及我国中国空气动力学研究与发展中心的CARDC-SBM撞击解体模型,以P-78卫星为例通过Matlab计算航天器碰撞解体模型结果并分析其各方面异同。分析结果表明:从碎片的尺寸、面质比和分离速度的分布来看,3种模型各有优劣。该研究为后续相关研究梳理了理论思路。 In o rd e r to solve the p ro b le m o f spacecraft c o llis io n caused by space d e b ris, the c o llis io n m o d e l is a nalyzedand com pared. T h is paper m a in ly in tro d u c e s three k in d s o f spacecraft c o llis io n b re a k u p m od e ls w h ic h are re p re se n ta tive athom e and abroad, in c lu d in g B a tte lle c o llis io n bre a ku p m o d e l, N A S A standard c o llis io n b re a ku p m o d e l and C A R D C -S B Mo f C h in a A e ro d y n a m ic s R esearch and D e v e lo p m e n t Center. F in a lly , ta k in g P -78 s a te llite as e xa m p le , ca lc u la te spacecraftc o llis io n bre a ku p m o d e l b y M a tla b and analyze the s im ila ritie s and d iffe re n ce s. T he re su lts s h o w th a t the m od e ls have th e iro w n advantages and disadvantages in te rm s o f the size o f the fra g m e n ts, area-to-m ass d is trib u tio n s and d e lta v e lo c ityd is trib u tio n s . I t p ro v id e s th e o re tic a l fo u n d a tio n fo r the fu rth e r study.
作者 齐跃 李怡勇 来嘉哲 Qi Yue1, L i Y iyong2, Lai Jiazhe2(1. College o f Graduate, Academy o f Equipment, Beijing 101416, China';2. Department o f Equipment Command, Academy o f Equipment, Beijing 101416, Chin)
出处 《兵工自动化》 2018年第2期74-77,共4页 Ordnance Industry Automation
关键词 航天器 空间碰撞 解体 模型 碎片 spacecraft space c o llis io n c o llis io n b re a ku p m o d e l fra g m e n t
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献89

  • 1柳森,谢爱民,黄洁,李毅,罗锦阳,石安华.超高速碰撞碎片云的激光阴影照相技术[J].实验流体力学,2005,19(2):35-39. 被引量:18
  • 2柳森,李毅,黄洁,罗锦阳,谢爱民,石安华.用于验证数值仿真的Whipple屏超高速撞击试验结果[J].宇航学报,2005,26(4):505-508. 被引量:28
  • 3马登武,叶文,李瑛.基于包围盒的碰撞检测算法综述[J].系统仿真学报,2006,18(4):1058-1061. 被引量:111
  • 4Johnson N L, Stansbery E, Whitlock D O, et al. History of on-orbit satellite fragmentations. NASA/TM - 2008 - 214779. 2008, 06,.
  • 5Klinkrad H, Alby F, Crowther R, et al. Space debris activities in europe[ C]//5th European Conference on Space Debris. March 30- April 2, 2009, Darmstadt, Germany.
  • 6Johnson N L. Space debris modeling at NASA. ESASP - 473 - 259J. 2001.
  • 7Jonas F, Yates K, Evans R. Comparisons of debris environment model-breakup models. AIAA 93 - 0166.
  • 8Johnson N L, Krisko P H, Liou J C, et al. NASA's new breakup model of EVOLVE 4.0[J]. Advances in Space Reaearch. 2001,25 (9) : 1377 - 1384.
  • 9Liou J C, Johnson N L, Krisko P H, et al. The new NASA orbital debris breakup model. COSPAR Colloquia Series, 2002, 15 : 363 - 367.
  • 10Krisko P H, Horstman M, Fudge M L. SOCIT4 collisonal-breakup test data analysis: With shape and materials characterization[ J]. Advances in Space Research. 2008, 41:1138- 1146.

共引文献34

同被引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部