期刊文献+

有无心脏外科支持的经皮冠状动脉介入术病例特点及转归的比较分析 被引量:1

Comparative Analysis of the Characteristics and Outcome of Patients Underwent PCI with or without Cardiac Surgery Support
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:分析有无心脏外科支持的经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)病例的特点及转归差异。方法:回顾性分析2308例行PCI术患者的病例资料,根据心脏外科支持情况分为支持组(2031例)、无支持组(277例),比较两组患者的基线资料、PCI术相关指标及主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的发生情况。结果:与支持组比较,无支持组患者的医疗费用明显增加,急诊PCI、危险因素中AMI病史、PCI史、疾病诊断中STEMI的比例明显降低,LVEF明显升高,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。支持组以三支及以上冠脉病变以及B、C型复杂病变形态多见,支架置入数、左主干病变比例明显增多,靶血管IVUS比例检查比例、术中总并发症发生率明显降低,与无支持组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组PCI术后MACE的发生率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:有无心脏外科支持的PCI患者的临床特点存在较大差异,无心脏外科支持的PCI患者以急诊手术为主,且靶血管病变相对较轻。对于低风险病例实施PCI手术是安全可行的,具有较高成功率,预后尚可。 Objective: To investigate the clinical characteristics and prognosis between patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) with or without cardiac surgery support. Methods: The clinical data of 2308 cases of patients underwent PCI were retrospectively analyzed, they were divided into the backup group(n=2031) and the non-backup group(n=277) according to the cardiac surgery support. The baseline information, PCI related indicators, and occurrence of major adverse cardiac events(MACE) in two groups were compared. Results: Compared with the backup group, there were significant increase in the medical costs and LVEF, decrease in the percentage of emergency PCI, history of AMI and PCI, STEMI in the non-backup group(P〈0.05). Backup group was given priority to triple-vessel disease and over, complex lesions of type B and C, numbers of stent placement and the proportion of left main lesion were significantly increased, and the proportion of target vessel intravascular ultrasound(IVUS), the success rate of PCI, total incidence of intraoperative complications were significantly lower than those in the non-backup group(P〈0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of MACE after PCI between two groups(P〈0.05). Conclusions: There is remarkable difference in the clinical characteristics in PCI between with or without cardiac surgery, PCI without cardiac surgery is given priority to emergency PCI with relatively milder lession of target vessel. PCI is safe and feasible for low risk cases, and has high success rate and fair prognosis.
作者 张洁函 庄少伟 居海宁 于亚梅 王玉华 佟士骅 郑兴 ZHANG Jie-han1,2,ZHUANG Shao-wei2,JU Hai-ning2,YU Ya-mei1,WANG Yu-hua2,TONG Shi-hua2,ZHENG Xing1(1 Department of Cardiology, Changhai Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200433; 2 Department of Cardiology, The 7th People's Hospital, Shanghai Universi(y of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200137)
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2018年第4期672-676,共5页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
基金 上海市科委科技支撑项目(13411950302)
关键词 经皮冠状动脉介入术 心脏外科支持 病例特点 转归 Percutaneous coronary intervention Cardiac surgery backup Characteristics Outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献58

  • 1吕树铮,宋现涛,陈韵岱,陈欣,中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗登记调查研究协作组.中国大陆2005年度经皮冠状动脉介入治疗登记调查研究结果初步分析[J].中华心血管病杂志,2006,34(11):966-970. 被引量:43
  • 2Kimmel SE,Berlin JA,Strom BL,et al.Development and validation of simplified predictive index for major complications in contemporary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty practice.The registry committee of the society for cardiac angiography and interventions.J Am Coll Cardiol,1995,26:931-938.
  • 3Moscucci M,Eagle KA,Share D,et al.Public reporting and case selection for percutaneous coronary interventions:an analysis from two large multicenter percutaneous coronary intervention databases.J Am Coll Cardiol,2005,45:1759-1765.
  • 4Hannan EL,Wu C,Walford G,et al.Volume-outcome relationships for percutaneous coronary interventions in the stent era.Circulation,2005,112:1171-1179.
  • 5King SB 3rd,Aversano T,Ballard WL.et al.ACCF/AHA/SCAI 2007 update of the clinical competence statement on cardiac interventional procedures:a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training (writing committee to update the 1998 clinical competence statement on recommendations for the assessment and maintenance of proficiency in coronary interventional procedures).J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,50:82-108.
  • 6Bommer WJ. Coronary revaseularization : then, now, future trends [ J ]. Rev Cardiovasc Med, 2014,15(2) :176-177.
  • 7White CJ. The future of interventional cardiology [ J ]. Catheter Cardio- vasc lnterv ,2013,81 ( 1 ) :4-5.
  • 8Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization : The Task Force on Myocardial Revascular- ization of the European Society of Cardiology( ESC ) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery ( EACTS ) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardi- ovascular Interventions( EAPCI ) [ J ]. Eur Heart J, 2014,35 ( 37 ) : 2541-2619.
  • 9Silvain J,Cayla G,Collet JP,et al. Coronary stents:30 years of medical progress [ J ]. Med Sei(Paris) ,2014,30 ( 3 ) :303-310.
  • 10Neamtu I, Chiriac AP, Diaconu A, et al. Current concepts on cardiovas- cular stent devices[J]. Mini Rev Med Chem,2014,14(6) :505-536.

共引文献172

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部