传统手术与微创手术治疗小儿疝气的临床效果比较

Comparison of clinical effect between traditional surgery and minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of pediatric hernia

目的比较在治疗小儿疝气中使用传统手术和微创手术的治疗效果。方法抽取我院自2016年1月-2017年1月收治的小儿疝气患者,将其中的120例选为本次研究对象,并将其分为观察组和对照组,每组60例。观察组的治疗使用微创手术进行,对照组患者的则使用传统手术进行治疗。统计并记录两组患者的手术时间、出血量、在手术之后能够进行自由活动的时间以及术后并发症,并且进行比较。结果观察组患者在经过治疗后使用的手术时间明显短于对照组,P<0.05,在手术中的出血量相较于对照组患者来说较少,P<0.05,且观察组患者在手术后到能够进行自由活动的时间较短,P<0.05,术后并发症的出现率同样出现较少,P<0.05。结论在治疗小儿疝气患者中使用微创手术,其临床治疗效果相较于传统手术来说较为理想,且使用的时间较短,具有很大的安全性。

Objective To compare the efficacy of conventional and minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of pediatric hernia.Methods 120 children with hernia in our hospital from January 2016 to January 2017 were selected and divided into the observation group and the control group according to the order of admission, with 60 cases in each group. All cases in observation group were treated with minimally invasive surgery, while all cases in control group were treated with traditional surgery. The operation time, blood loss, time for getting out of bed after operation and postoperative complications between the two groups were recorded and compared. Results The operation time of the patients in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group,（P〈0.05）, the amount of bleeding during surgery in the observation group was less compared with that in the control group（P〈0.05）, and time when patients can get out of bed freely after the operation in the observation group is shorter, P〈0.05, and postoperative complication rate also appeared less, P〈0.05. Conclusion In the treatment of pediatric hernia, the clinical treatment effect of minimally invasive surgery is more ideal than that of traditional surgery with a shorter time and more security.