期刊文献+

跨学科研究生教育培养模式创新——以能力和身份认同为核心 被引量:17

Innovation of Training Models in Interdisciplinary Postgraduate Education:Focused on Competence and Identity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究生教育是世界一流大学和一流学科的重要载体,对跨学科模式的探讨是研究生创新型人才培养的重要方向。提升研究生跨学科能力的路径,一是在跨学科课程与教学上,采用基于问题解决的学习方式,创建跨学科学习社群,支持跨学科实践活动;二是在跨学科合作项目上,将以创建跨学科研究机构为核心的理念转变为以跨学科研究生为纽带组建项目和导师团队的理念;三是在跨学科研究生指导上,确立教师和学生的跨学科身份认同,采用多元灵活的评价方式。跨学科研究生教育的三种路径,以提升高阶能力和确立身份认同为核心,有助于推进高水平跨学科研究的开展。 The transformation of postgraduate education and training is crucial to improve graduate students' interdisciplinary research capacity. The goals of interdisciplinary postgraduate education can be reached through interdisciplinary teaching and learning,interdisciplinary collaborative research projects and interdisciplinary postgraduate supervision. Some suggestions are offered for improving the practice of interdisciplinary graduate education in China: 1) adopting PBL method in interdisciplinary curriculum design and implementation,building interdisciplinary learning communities and supporting interdisciplinary creative practices,which are beneficial to develop higher-order cognition,and to construct and apply knowledge; 2) changing the idea from focus on interdisciplinary infrastructure to interdisciplinary collaborative research projects and team building which based on interdisciplinary graduate students training; 3) selecting potential students and enhancing advisors' competence of interdisciplinary guidance,as well as building their interdisciplinary identity,are the emphasis of training,which requires diverse and more flexible approaches for evaluating the interdisciplinary research achievements and the quality of graduates.
作者 徐岚 陶涛 XU Lan a;TAO Tao b(a. Institute of Educatio;b. Graduate School, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujia)
出处 《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第2期65-74,共10页 Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
基金 中国学位与研究生教育学会面上项目"研究型大学跨学科人才培养现状及其体制机制研究"(B1-2015Y0506-015)
关键词 跨学科 培养模式 课程与教学 合作项目 研究生指导 interdisciplinary, training models, curriculum and teaching, collaborative research projects, postgraduate supervision
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献32

  • 1菲利普G.阿特巴赫,别敦荣,陈丽.美国博士教育的现状与问题[J].教育研究,2004,25(6):34-41. 被引量:49
  • 2European University Association. Doctoral Programmes for the European Knowledge Society [ R ]. Brussels, Belgium,2005.31-32.
  • 3Guy Neave. The Business of University Research [J]. Higher education policy,2004,17( 1 ) : 1-4.
  • 4UK Council for Graduate Education. Graduate schools[Rl. UCFGE, 1995.8.
  • 5Diana Woodward, Pam Denicolo, Suzanne Hayward, Elizabeth Long. A review of graduate schools in the UK[R]. UK Council for Graduate education, 2004. 22.
  • 6Klaus Huefner. Germany [A]. Sadlak,J. ed.. Doctoral Studies and Qualifications in Europe and the United States: Status and Prospects [C]. Bucarest: UNESCO- CEPES,2004. 56.
  • 7Ahola,S. and Kivinen,Osmo. Postgraduate education in Europe: harmonizing with a dissonance? [EB/OL] http://www.hsv.se/download/18.539a949110f3d5914ecS00090 622/ahola.pdf.
  • 8Sverker Sodin,etc.. A public good:PhD education in Denmark,report from an international evaluation panel [R]. Ministry of Science,Technology and Innovation,2006. 58.
  • 9European University Association. Doctoral pro- grammes in Europe's universities: Achievements and challenges [R]. Report prepared for European universities and ministers of higher education, 2007.9,10.
  • 10Arwen Raddon and Johnny Sung. The Career Choices and Impact of PhD Graduates in the UK: A Synthesis Review[R]. Report prepared for the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) "Science in Society" Team and the Research Councils UK (RCUK) Research Careers and Diversity Unit, 2008.7.

同被引文献165

引证文献17

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部