期刊文献+

FPSO油气泄漏燃爆连锁风险量化分析与屏障控制研究 被引量:2

QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT AND SAFETY BARRIER CONTROL FOR FPSO SUBJECTED TO OIL & GAS LEAKAGE AND DEFLAGRATION CHAIN HAZARDS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为量化评估FPSO油气泄漏、燃爆连锁风险,采用因果图法分析风险致因因素的关联性和人员伤亡事故模式及风险路径,结合贝叶斯网络模型计算FPSO油气泄漏、燃爆事故频率,从安全屏障角度提出风险控制策略并进行安全屏障失效分析。结果表明:因果图可分析FPSO泄漏油气燃爆风险演化过程及事故发生路径;FPSO发生小型、中型和重大油气燃爆事故频率分别为0.074 79,0.083 74,和0.003 594 a/船,油气泄漏、燃爆连锁风险高;基于控制措施的安全屏障模型是降低风险的保障;屏障失效形式包括活动失效和潜伏失效,其通过事故树中的或门与对应顶上事件相连接,失效形式越多,危害越大。 A cause-effect diagram is adopted to analyze the inner logic of risk contributing factors and accident patterns of casualty and risk paths of fatal accidents in order to make quantitative risk assessment for FPSO subjected to oil & gas leakage and deflagration chain hazards. Then the paper utilizes the Bayesian network model to calculate the frequency of FPSO oil & gas leakage and deflagration accidents. Safety barriers are proposed as control measures for FPSO risk and its failure mode is analyzed. The results show that causality diagram is practical to forecast FPSO oil & gas deflagration risk evolution and accident route. The frequency of minor,significant and major oil & gas deflagration accidents of FPSO is0. 07479,0. 08374 and 0. 003594 respectively,which shows that FPSO is under great deflagration risk. The control measures based on safety barriers models can efficiently minimize FPSO oil & gas deflagration risk. Active and potential failure both will disable safety barriers and each failure mode associates with the top event through AND gates. The more the failure modes are,the greater the damage is.
出处 《石油化工安全环保技术》 CAS 2018年第1期34-38,共5页 Petrochemical Safety and Environmental Protection Technology
关键词 浮式生产储卸油装置 燃爆风险 致因因素 贝叶斯模型 安全屏障 Floating production storage offloading/FPSO Deflagration risk Contributing factors Bayesian model Safety barrier
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献68

  • 1王晓燕.海洋工程的安全风险评估研究[J].山东科学,2005,18(5):43-47. 被引量:10
  • 2赵金城,沈为平.高温下钢框架结构非线性有限元分析[J].上海交通大学学报,1996,30(8):55-59. 被引量:13
  • 3Jorn Amdabl. Consequences of ship collisions[ C ]//Division of Marine Structures, the Norwegian Institute of Technology. Seminar on Collide II Project-Risk Assessment-Colhsion of Ships with Offshore Platforms. 1991.
  • 4牟善军.海上石油工程风险评估技术研究[D].青岛:中国海洋大学,2005.
  • 5Ken Paterson, Vincent H Y Tam, Thanos Mows, et al. The design of BP ETAP platform against gas explosions[ J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2000, 13(1) :73-79.
  • 6惠美洋彦.液体气体安全性研究[J].日本造船协会论文集,1984,156:558—566.
  • 7Stain Hoset, Bjom H Hjertager, Tron Solberg, et al. Statistical estimation of loads from gas explosions[J]. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 1997, 10(4) : 271-283.
  • 8Ravichandra Pulaa, Faisal I Khana, Brian Veitcha, et al. Revised fire consequence models for offshore quantitative risk assessment [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2005, 18: 443-454.
  • 9Jan Erik Vinnem. Offshore Risk Assessment [M]. Norway: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.
  • 10Henrich H W,Petersen D,Roose N.Industrial Accident Prevention[M].New York:McGraw-Hill,1980:50-53.

共引文献75

同被引文献30

引证文献2

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部