期刊文献+

产业政策、企业退出与区域生产效率演变 被引量:7

Industrial Policy, Firm Exit and Regional Production Efficiency Dynamics in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文研究政府产业政策和市场竞争对企业退出行为的影响,并进一步考察区域产业生产效率演变。研究发现,政府设立经济开发区等政策性区域和对企业进行直接补贴等产业政策有明显的保护作用,使得低效率企业能够在市场中生存;而在集聚程度高的地方和有明显优势产业的地方,企业间竞争程度会更大,市场机制能发挥更大的作用,只有生产率更高的企业才能生存下来。这种政府与市场对企业的微观作用会反馈到产业的区域生产效率演变。政策保护和市场竞争会对产业的空间布局和动态效率演变产生重要影响,但其在产业升级与竞争力提升方面的效果和作用机制都还有待进一步的探讨。 Market competition drives industrial dynamics. Theoretically, only productive firms can survive the fierce market competition. In the transitional China, protection oriented industrial policies implemented by local governments however may keep some less productive firms in the market. Industrial agglomeration further provides conditions to help firm survival. This study first explores the link between TFP and firm exit and then investigates the firm exit decision by highlighting the role of industrial policies and industrial agglomeration and specialization. Based on the Annual Survey of Industrial Firms in China during 1998--2007, this study found that exiting firms suffer from low efficiency while surviving firms are more productive. Statistical results indicate that firms located in industrial zones and granted with heavy subsidies are less likely to exit, showing the significant role of local protection policies. In cities with substantial concentration of industries, firms may compete with each other fiercely and only productive firms can survive. The dual roles of state power and market force can also shed light on the regional production efficiency dynamics in China.
作者 杨汝岱 朱诗娥 Yang Rudai;Zhu Shi'e
出处 《学术月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第4期33-45,共13页 Academic Monthly
基金 国家社科重大项目“创造有利于制造业发展的竞争环境研究”(15ZDA027) 国家自科基金项目“市场化、社会资本与中国阶层流动性研究”(71473212)的阶段性成果
关键词 企业退出 产业政策 集聚 生产率 firm exit, industrial policies, industrial agglomeration, TFP
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献27

  • 1郭庆旺,贾俊雪.中国全要素生产率的估算:1979—2004[J].经济研究,2005,40(6):51-60. 被引量:1220
  • 2王志刚,龚六堂,陈玉宇.地区间生产效率与全要素生产率增长率分解(1978—2003)[J].中国社会科学,2006(2):55-66. 被引量:448
  • 3Baily, Activity: M M. N.,C Hulten, and D. Campbell, 1992, "Productivity Dynamics in Manufacturing Plants", Brookings Papers on Economic , 187-267.
  • 4Brandt, L., J. Van. Biesebroeck, L. Wang, and Y. Zhang, 2012, "WTO Accession and Performance of Chinese Manufacturing Firms", CEPR Discussion Paper No. 9166.
  • 5Brandt, L. ,and T. G. Rawski, 2008, China's Great Economic Transformation, Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Brandt, L. , J. Van Biesebroeck, and Y. Zhang, 2012, "Creative Accounting or Creative Destruction? Firm-level Productivity Growth in Chinese Manufacturing", Journal of Development Economics, 97 (2), 339-351.
  • 7Foster, L. , J. C. Haltiwanger, and C. Syverson, 2008, "Reallocation, Firm Turnover and Effciency: Selection on Productivity or Protability?" ,American Economic Review, 98( 1 ) , 394-425.
  • 8Griliches, Z. , and H. Regev, 1995, "Firm Productivity in Israeli Industry : 1979-1988", Journal of Econometrics, 65,175-203.
  • 9Hsieh, C. -T. ,and P. J. Klenow, 2009, "Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4) , 1403-1448.
  • 10Khandelwal, A. K. , P. K. Sehott, and S. Wei, 2013, "Trade Liberalization and" Embedded Institutional Reform: Evidence from Chinese Exporters", American Economic Review, 103 (6), 2169-2195.

共引文献957

同被引文献145

引证文献7

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部