期刊文献+

小我争面子、大我争面子与社会排斥感相关研究 被引量:1

A Research on the Relationship Between Small Self Acquisitive Face Orientation, Big Self Acquisitive Face Orientation and Social Exclusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以599名大学生为研究对象,探究了大学生小我争面子、大我争面子与社会排斥感之间的关系。结果发现,大学生小我争面子与直接排斥感、间接排斥感和整体社会排斥感呈显著正相关,大学生大我争面子与直接排斥感、间接排斥感及整体社会排斥感呈显著负相关。回归分析发现,小我争面子正向预测社会排斥感的各个维度和总体社会排斥感,大我争面子则负向预测社会排斥感的各个维度和总体社会排斥感。方差差异分析发现,相对于低年级大学生,高年级大学生有更高的小我争面子意识和更低的大我争面子意识,后者体验到的社会排斥感亦较高。研究为在教育过程中帮助难以融入集体的学生提供了新的干预方法,对于遭到社会排斥感的学生可引导其为团体(班集体、学生社团等)大我争面子,以减少其在学生群体中体验到的排斥感。最后分析并讨论了本研究的不足和未来研究展望。 The study explored the relationship between Small Self-Acquisition Face Orientation, Big Self-Acquisitive Face Orientation and Social Exclusion through a sample of 599 college students. Correlation analysis found that small self-acquisition face orientation was positively related with direct social exclusion, indirect social exclusion and the entire score of social exclusion significantly. While big self acquisition face orientation related significantly negatively with direct social exclusion, indirect social exclusion and the entire score of social exclusion. Hierarchical regression analyses showed that small self-acquisition face orientation could positively predict direct social exclusion, indirect social exclusion and the entire social exclusion, while big self-acquisition face orientation could negatively predict direct social exclusion, indirect social exclusion and the entire social exclusion. ANOVAs analysis found that senior year college students got significantly higher scores on small self-acquisition face orientation and lower scores on big self- acquisition face orientation than junior year students. And senior year college students had higher scores at direct social exclusion, indirect social exclusion and the entire social exclusion. The findings suggest that interventions addressing big self-acquisition face orientation may be benefit for students who are experiencing social exclusion. Directions for future research are suggested.
作者 梁凤华 LIANG Fenghua(School of Education Sciences, ShangRao Normal University ShangRao 334001)
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第2期283-288,共6页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 江西省社会科学"十三五"规划项目(17SH09) 江西省高校人文社会科学项目(XL1521)
关键词 小我争面子 大我争面子 社会排斥感 small self acquisitive face orientation, big self acquisitive face orientation, social exclusion
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献22

  • 1李文道,钮丽丽,邹泓.中学生压力生活事件、人格特点对压力应对的影响[J].心理发展与教育,2000,16(4):8-13. 被引量:76
  • 2翟学伟.个人地位:一个概念及其分析框架——中国日常社会的真实建构[J].中国社会科学,1999(4):144-157. 被引量:95
  • 3佟新,梁萌.女大学生就业过程中的性别歧视研究[J].妇女研究论丛,2006(S2):32-36. 被引量:31
  • 4温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620. 被引量:7399
  • 5Rice Phillip L(石林 古丽娜 梁竹苑 等译).压力与健康[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2000..
  • 6Carver, C. S.,Connor-Smith, J. Personality and coping[J]. Annual re- view of psychology, 2010, 61: 679-704.
  • 7Burgess, L., Irvine, F.,Wallymahmed, A. Personality, stress and cop- ing in intensive care nurses: a descriptive exploratory study [J]. Nurs- ing in Critical care, 2010, 15(3 ) : 129-140.
  • 8Buehler R, Griffin D. Planning, personality, and prediction: The role of future focus in optimistic time predictions[J]. Organizational Behav- ior and Human Decision Processes 2003 ; 92( 1 ) : 80-90.
  • 9Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recom- mended remedies[J]. J Appl Psychology. 2003, 88(5 ):879-886.
  • 10Fortunato VJ, Furey JT. The Theory of MindTime: The relationships between thinking perspective and time perspective[J]. Personality and Individual Differences 2010,48 (4) : 436-441.

共引文献18

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部