期刊文献+

胸腹腔镜联合手术治疗食管癌的临床分析 被引量:22

Clinical analysis of thoracoscopic laparoscopic surgery in treatment of esophageal carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的客观评价胸腹腔镜联合手术治疗食管癌的近期临床疗效和安全性。方法回顾性分析行胸腹腔镜联合手术的93例食管癌(微创组)和同期行常规开放性手术的104例食管癌患者(开放组)的临床资料,分析其根治性及近期临床疗效差异。结果两组患者在性别、年龄和TNM分期等一般资料方面比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。微创组手术时间较开放组长(P<0.01),而在出血量、胸腔引流量以及胸管置留时间和住院时间方面优于开放组(均P<0.05)。微创组与开放组在淋巴结处理数、术后淋巴结转移率及胸腹腔淋巴结转移枚数方面比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论胸腹腔镜联合食管癌手术安全可行,根治性较好,近期疗效可靠。 Objective To evaluate the short-term clinical efficacy and safety of thoracoscopic laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Methods The clinical data of 93 patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent thoracoscopic laparoscopic surgery(minimally invasive group) and 104 patients who underwent conventional open surgery(open surgery group) were analyzed retrospectively. The radical and short-term efficacies were compared between two groups. Results No significant difference was observed in gender,age and TNM stages between two groups(all P〈0. 05). The minimally invasive group was superior to the open surgery group in terms of blood loss,thoracic drainage volume,thoracic drainage duration and hospitalization duration(all P〈0. 05),but it had longer operation time(P〈0. 01).The minimal invasive group had more dissected lymph nodes,lower postoperative metastasis rates and less metastatic thoracic and abdominal lymph nodes than the open surgery group(all P〈0. 05). Conclusion Thoracoscopic laparoscopic surgery has high radical rate and reliable short-term clinical efficacy and high safety in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma.
作者 杜大军 Du Dajun(Department of Oncological Surgery, Xinyang Central Hospital, Xinyang 464000 ,Chin)
出处 《实用肿瘤杂志》 CAS 2018年第2期170-173,共4页 Journal of Practical Oncology
关键词 食管肿瘤/外科学 食管切除术/方法 胸腔镜检查 腹腔镜检查 治疗结果 esophageal neoplasms/surgery esophagectomy/methods thoracoscopy laparoscopy treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献76

  • 1夏艳.无瘤技术在恶性肿瘤手术中的应用[J].当代护士(中旬刊),2006,13(4):58-59. 被引量:55
  • 2吕铁升,赵中华,党诚学.食管癌贲门癌切除术后器械吻合口早期隐性瘘的诊治分析(附1例典型病例分析)[J].现代肿瘤医学,2008,16(11):1930-1931. 被引量:3
  • 3方文涛,陈文虎,范利民,曹克俭,陈勇,蒋勇.食管癌切除术后不同重建途径吻合口瘘的原因及预防[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2005,8(3):217-219. 被引量:56
  • 4张丽青,陈惠男,顾一君.循证护理在腹腔镜恶性肿瘤手术的无瘤技术配合中的应用[J].中华护理杂志,2007,42(6):510-511. 被引量:23
  • 5Igaki H,Tachimori Y,Kato H.Improved survival for patients with upper and/or middle mediastinal lymph node metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma of the lower thoracic esophagus treated with 3-field dissection.Ann Surg,2004,239:483-490.
  • 6Fang WT,Chen WH,Chen Y,et al.Sdective three-field lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous carcinoma.Dis Esophagus,2007.20:206-211.
  • 7Zhang HL,Chen LQ,Liu RL,et al.The number of lymph node metastases influences survival and Intemational Union Against Cancer tumor-node-metastasis classification for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Dis Esophagus,2010,23:53-58.
  • 8Xiao ZF,Yang ZY,Miao YJ,et al.Influence of number of metastatic lymph nedes on survival of curative reacted thoracic esophageal cancer patients and value of radiotherapy:report of 549 cases.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2005,62:82-90.
  • 9Mariette C,Piessen G,Briez N,et al.The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extent.Ann Surg,2008.247:365-371.
  • 100'Riordan JM,Rowley S,Murphy JO,et al.Impact of solitary involved lymph node on outcome in localized cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction.J Gastrointest Surg,2007,11:493-499.

共引文献319

同被引文献168

引证文献22

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部