期刊文献+

信息不对称下基于回购的供应链金融决策研究 被引量:10

Strategies for Supply Chain Finance Based on Buy-back Requirement with Asymmetric Information
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文建立了一个由银行、资金充裕的供应商以及有资金约束的零售商组成的供应链金融系统。在传统报童模型的基础上,结合博弈论以及信息不对称理论建立了三个紧密相关的双层Stackelberg模型,分别研究了在信息完全对称以及信息不对称下供应链金融系统各主体的最优决策,对比分析了两者之间的差异,并着重研究了供应商回购比例以及零售商自有资金水平对于决策结果的影响。结果发现,信息不对称会导致银行贷款利率偏高,供应商的回购比例以及零售商的自有资金水平会对利率以及订购量产生影响,引入第三方物流公司实施存货质押并共享信息的模式可有效减少信息不对称造成的效率损失。 In this paper, we design a SCF system composed of a bank, a supplier and a capital constraint retailer. Based on the traditional newsvendor model, we employ the game theory and information asymmetry theory to build three models closely connective by which we analyze the optimal strategies of the SCF in the asymmetric and symmetric information circumstance respectively and consider the effects that the proportion of buy-back and the intern capital of the retailer will have on the SCF's performance. We conclude that the asymmetric information may lead to the high loan rate which can also be affected significantly by the proportion of buy-back and retailer's intern capital and that SCF can relieve the problem greatly caused by asymmetric information when the retailer adopts the inventory financing and the 3PL company shares the information with the bank.
作者 谭小芬 张辉 Tan Xiaofen;Zhang Hui(School of Finance, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China)
出处 《南开经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第1期104-123,共20页 Nankai Economic Studies
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目(12BGJ042) 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(14JZD016) 中央财经大学重大科研课题培育项目(14ZZD004) 中央财经大学青年科研创新团队支持计划的资助 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金
关键词 供应链金融 回购 信息不对称 最优决策 SCF Buy-back Asymmetric Information Optimal Strategies
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献27

  • 1申悦,于瑞峰,吴甦,刘丽文.零售商B ertrand竞争下的供应链成本信息共享价值[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005,45(11):1581-1584. 被引量:47
  • 2杨胜刚,胡海波.不对称信息下的中小企业信用担保问题研究[J].金融研究,2006(1):118-126. 被引量:115
  • 3彭志忠,王水莲.基于委托代理理论的物流金融信任机制研究[J].中国流通经济,2007,21(6):13-15. 被引量:14
  • 4Stiglitz J, Weiss A.Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information[J]. American Economics Review, 1981, 71(3): 393-410.
  • 5Bester H.Screening vs Rationing in credit markets with imperfect information[J].American Economics Review,1985, 75(4): 850-855.
  • 6Williamson S. Costly monitoring, financial intermediation, and equilibrium credit rationing[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1986, 18: 159-179.
  • 7Stiglitz J E,Weiss A. Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information[J]. The American Economic Review, 1981,71(3) :393-410.
  • 8Edelstein R H, Urosevic B. Optimal loan interest rate contract design[J]. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2003,26(2) : 127-156.
  • 9Rothschild M, Stiglitz J. Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets:an essay in the economies of imperfect information[ J ]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1976,90: 629-649.
  • 10Ben-Shahar D,Feldman D. Signaling and screening equilibrium in the mortgage market[ J ]. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics ,2003,26:157-178.

共引文献50

同被引文献109

引证文献10

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部