急性胸痛患者的抢救护理探讨

Study on Emergency Nursing of Patients with Acute Chest Pains

目的探究急性胸痛患者有效的抢救护理方法。方法从该院2015年06月—2017年5月选取90例急诊收治的胸痛患者,进行回顾性分析,采用常规护理的为对照组,采用优化抢救护理的为观察组,每组45例。观察两组患者的护理效果。结果对照组中抢救成功40例(88.89%),抢救失败5例(11.11%)。观察组中抢救成功患者45例(100.00%),无抢救失败患者。对照组抢救成功率明显低于观察组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组病情得以掌握例数为38例,有效率达到84.44%,观察组病情得到有效掌握45例,有效率为100.00%,对照组病情掌握率明显低于观察组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者的满意率为93.33%,对照组为77.78%,两组数据差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论优化抢救护理方式能够提高护理质量,缩短对患者的抢救时间和住院时间,提高患者满意度,促进患者治疗。

Objective To study the emergency nursing of patients with acute chest pains. Methods 90 cases of emergency chest pains patients treated in our hospital from June 2015 to May 2015 were selected, the control group used the routine nursing, while the observation group used the optimized emergency nursing, and the nursing effect of the two groups was observed. Results In the control group, the emergency of 40 cases was successful, accounting for88.89%, and of 5 cases was failed, accounting for 11.11%; in the observation group, the emergency of 45 cases was successful, accounting for 100.00%, there was no one whose emergency was failed, and the emergency successful rate in the control group was obviously lower than that in the observation group, and the difference was statistically significant（P〈0.05）, and in the control group, the disease mastery rate in the control group was obviously lower than that in the observation group（38 cases vs 45 cases, 84.44% vs 100.00%）, and the difference was statistically significant（P〈0.05）, and the difference in the satisfactory degree between the observation group and the control group was obvious（93.33% vs 77.78%）,with statistical significance（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Optimizing the emergency nursing way can improve the nursing quality, shorten the emergency time and length of stay, improve the satisfactory degree and promote the treatment of patients.