流程化护理干预在牙列缺损种植牙修复中的应用效果

The application effect of process nursing intervention in dental restorations of dentition defect

目的 探讨流程化护理干预对牙列缺损种植牙修复的应用效果.方法 选取2014年9月～2017年8月该院接诊的150例牙列缺损种植牙修复的患者作为研究对象.按照随机数字表法将其均分为研究组和对照组,各75例.对照组患者给予常规护理方法进行干预,研究组在对照组的护理基础上给予流程化护理.对两组患者种植牙成功率、治疗满意度、治疗后并发症情况、患者住院时间以及SAS评分情况进行比较.结果研究组患者的种植牙成功率（96.00％）明显高于对照组患者的种植牙成功率（90.67％）,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）.研究组患者的护理满意度（98.67％）明显高于对照组患者的护理满意度（86.67％）,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）.研究组患者的并发症情况发生率（4.00％）明显短于对照组患者的并发症情况发生率（21.33％）,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）.研究组患者的住院时间明显短于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.01）;研究组患者的SAS评分结果明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.01）.结论 流程化护理干预能够提高牙列缺损种植牙修复患者的治疗成功率,提高患者满意度,降低并发症的发生率,降低住院时间,改善患者的焦虑情况,效果良好.

Objective To explore the application effect of process nursing intervention on dental implant resto- ration. Methods A total of 150 patients with dentition defect treated in our hospital from September 2014 to August 2017 were selected as the research objects and were divided into study group and control group according to the random number table method, 75 cases of each group. The patients of the control group were given routine nursing interven- tion, and the research group was given process nursing on the basis of nursing in the control group. The success rate, treatment satisfaction, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and SAS score were compared between the two groups. Results The success rate of dental implant in the study group （96. 00% ） was significantly higher than that of the control group （ 90. 67% ）, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant （ P 〈 0. 05） . The satisfaction degree of the patients in the study group （98.67%） was significantly higher than that of the control group （86. 67% ）, and the difference was statistically significant （P〈0. 05 ） . The incidence rate of complica- tions of patients in the study group （4. 00% ） was significantly lower than that of the control group （21.33%）, and the difference was statistically significant （P〈0. 05 ） . The hospitalization time of patients in the study group was signifi- cantly lower than that of the control group （21.33%）, and the difference was statistically significant （P〈0. 01 ）. The SAS score of the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant （P〈0. 01 ） . Conclusion The process of nursing intervention can improve the treatment success rate of pa- tients with dentition defect, improve the patient satisfaction, reduce the incidence of complications, reduce the hospi- talization time and improve the anxiety of patients, and the effect is good.