期刊文献+

腹腔镜辅助阴式全子宫切除术(LAVH)治疗巨大子宫肌瘤的临床疗效 被引量:3

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨分析腹腔镜辅助阴式全子宫切除术(LAVH)治疗巨大子宫肌瘤的临床疗效。方法选取我院收治的80例巨大子宫肌瘤患者作为研究对象,随机分为观察组与对照组(各40例),观察组实施腹腔镜辅助阴式全子宫切除术(LAVH)进行治疗,对照组实施传统开腹全子宫切除术(TAH)进行治疗。结果两组患者的手术时长差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组的术中出血量、肛门排气时间、开始下床活动时间、住院时间皆明显低于对照组,发热、感染、输尿管损伤、膀胱损伤、皮下气肿、脂肪液化等术后并发症的总发生率(10.0%)明显低于对照组的(27.5%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜辅助阴式全子宫切除术(LAVH)治疗巨大子宫肌瘤可以显著降低术中出血量,缩短肛门排气、下床活动与住院时间,术后并发症发生风险低,安全性高,值得临床应用。
作者 冯秋月
出处 《首都食品与医药》 2018年第9期7-8,共2页 Capital Food Medicine
基金 茂名市科技计划项目 编号:170531001705250
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献50

  • 1贺英,刘晓娟,路继成,姬宏宇,焦桂清,李立楠,梁登辉.开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术与腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术对老年患者DDI评分及预后的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(10):2627-2629. 被引量:43
  • 2Shetty J, Shanbhag A, Pandey D, et al. Converting potential abdominal hysterectomy to vaginal one: laparoscopie assisted vaginal hysterectomy[J]. Minim Invasive Surg, 2014, 14(2): 614-615.
  • 3Kim EG, Park H J, Kang H, et al. Antiemetic effect of propofol administered at the end of surgery in laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy[J]. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2014, 66(3): 210-215.
  • 4Tapper AM, Hannola M, Zeitlin R, et al. A systematic review and cost analysis of robot-assisted hysterectomy in malignant and benign conditions [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2014, 15 (14): 142-144.
  • 5Fulcher PH Jr, Granese M, Churl Y, et al. Intraoperative utilization of dexamethasone/bupivacaine/gentamicin solution in laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy and pain management [J]. W V Med J, 2014, 110(1): 10-15.
  • 6Kim T J, Song T, Choi CH, et al. Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomies: laparoscopic hysterectomy with some vaginal component versus laparoscopically assisted vaginal hystere- ctomy[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2014, 24(4):254-259.
  • 7Minaglia S. Vaginal trachelectomy following laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and sacrocervicopexy [J].Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 2014, 20(2): 116-118.
  • 8Yang YS, Kim SY, Hur MH, et al. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (NAVH vs. SP-LAVH): A case-matched study [J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2014, 21(14): 35-41.
  • 9Dayaratna S,Goldberg J,Harrington C, et al. Hospital costs of total vagiaal hysterectomy compared with other minimally invasive hysterectomy[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 210(2): 11-16.
  • 10DaCosta V, Mclntosh A, Wynter S, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy at the University Hospital of the West Indies: a 5-year retrospective study [J]. West Indian Med J, 2012, 61(9): 865-869.

共引文献94

同被引文献31

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部