摘要
一些在政治立场上亲加洛林家族的史家们,在历史叙述中塑造了"墨洛温懒王"的形象。他们丑化国王是为加洛林家族篡权夺位制造合理性。"墨洛温懒王"的描述只是大体上反映了王朝末年国王衰败、加洛林宫相崛起的发展趋势和最终结果,其历史叙述夹杂着著作人的政治倾向与政治意图,不完全是历史事实。
Some historians who supported the Carolingians in the political stands portrayed the image of the Merovingian "do-nothing kings" in their historical narrations. They vilified the kings in order to justify the rationality of the Carolingians' usurpation. The descriptions about the Merovingian "do-nothing kings" only reflected the general development trends and the final result, but the historical narrations were mixed with the authors' political inclinations and political intentions. The descriptions were not exact historical facts.
出处
《经济社会史评论》
2018年第1期70-81,共12页
Economic and Social History Review