期刊文献+

Cycle number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy might influence survival of patients with T1-4N2-3M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma 被引量:2

Cycle number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy might influence survival of patients with T1-4N2-3M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Objective: Stage N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC) shows a high risk of distant metastasis, which will finally cause death. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NACT) of various cycles before radical radiotherapy on distant metastasis and survival of patients with stage N2-3 diseases.Methods: In this study, a total of 1,164 consecutive patients with non-metastatic N2-3 NPC were recruited and prospectively observed. Then 231 patients who received NACT of 4 cycles(NACT=4 group) were matched 1:2:1 to 462 patients treated with NACT of 2 cycles(NACT=2 group) and 231 patients treated without NACT(NACT=0 group), according to age, histological subtype, N stage and NACT regimen. Five candidate variables(sex, T stage, concurrent chemotherapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy and cycle number of NACT) were analyzed for their association with patients' survival.Results: After matching, the overall survival(OS), disease-free survival(DFS), local-recurrence-free survival(RFS) and distant-metastasis-free survival(MFS) of the NACT=4 group(89.2%, 81.0%, 83.3% and 84.8%,respectively) were better than those of the NACT=2 group(83.3%, 72.5%, 81.2% and 77.9%, respectively) and the NACT=0 group(74.0%, 63.2%, 74.0% and 68.8%, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the cycle number of NACT maintained statistical significance on the OS, DFS, RFS and MFS(all P〈0.05).Conclusions: For N2-3 NPC, cycle number of NACT appeared to be an independent factor associated with an improvement of survival. Objective: Stage N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC) shows a high risk of distant metastasis, which will finally cause death. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NACT) of various cycles before radical radiotherapy on distant metastasis and survival of patients with stage N2-3 diseases.Methods: In this study, a total of 1,164 consecutive patients with non-metastatic N2-3 NPC were recruited and prospectively observed. Then 231 patients who received NACT of 4 cycles(NACT=4 group) were matched 1:2:1 to 462 patients treated with NACT of 2 cycles(NACT=2 group) and 231 patients treated without NACT(NACT=0 group), according to age, histological subtype, N stage and NACT regimen. Five candidate variables(sex, T stage, concurrent chemotherapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy and cycle number of NACT) were analyzed for their association with patients' survival.Results: After matching, the overall survival(OS), disease-free survival(DFS), local-recurrence-free survival(RFS) and distant-metastasis-free survival(MFS) of the NACT=4 group(89.2%, 81.0%, 83.3% and 84.8%,respectively) were better than those of the NACT=2 group(83.3%, 72.5%, 81.2% and 77.9%, respectively) and the NACT=0 group(74.0%, 63.2%, 74.0% and 68.8%, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the cycle number of NACT maintained statistical significance on the OS, DFS, RFS and MFS(all P〈0.05).Conclusions: For N2-3 NPC, cycle number of NACT appeared to be an independent factor associated with an improvement of survival.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Cancer Research》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2018年第1期51-60,共10页 中国癌症研究(英文版)
基金 supported by the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China (Grant No. 2017A020215157)
关键词 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy nasopharyngeal carcinoma cycle number distant metastasis survival Neoadjuvant chemotherapy nasopharyngeal carcinoma cycle number distant metastasis survival
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献23

  • 1Mei QX. The newest research on nasopharyngeal carcinoma and its countermeasures. Beijing: China Press of Traditional Chinese medicine, 2010:14-65. [in Chinese].
  • 2Chang ET, Adami HO. The enigmatic epidemiology of naso- pharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2006,15:1765-1777.
  • 3Hao J, Chen WQ. 2012 Chinese cancer registry annual report. Beijing: Military Medical Science Press, 2012:17;44-47. [in Chinese].
  • 4Jia WH, Huang QH, Liao J, et al. Trends in incidence and mortality of nasopharyngeal carcinoma over a 20-25 year period (1978/1983-2002) in Sihui and Cangwu counties in southern China. BMC Cancer, 2006,6:178.
  • 5Wei KR, Liang ZH, Ou ZX. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma mortality in Zhongshan city of Canton in 1970-2010. Zhongguo Ai Zheng Za Zhi, 2014,24:241-245. [in Chinese].
  • 6Curado MP, Edwards B, Shin HR, et al. Cancer incidence in five continents volume IX. Lyon: IARC Scientific Publications, 2007:137- 143.
  • 7Forman D, Bray F, Brewster DH, et al. Cancer incidence in five continents, Vol. X. Lyon, IARC Scientific Publication. [2013-10, 2014-06-18].
  • 8Available at: http://ci5.iarc.fr. Chen WQ, Zhang SW, Zeng HM, et al. 2010 cancer incidence and mortality in China. Zhongguo Zhong Liu, 2014,23:1-10. [in Chinese].
  • 9National Office for Cancer Control and Prevention, Information Centre of Health Statistics of Health Ministry, National Centre forCancer Registration. Guideline for Cancer Registration in China. Beijing: Military Medical Science Press, 2004:50-58. [in Chinese].
  • 10Ferlay J, Soerjomataraml, Ervik M, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 vl.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No.11. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2013 [2013-12-12, 2014-01-18].

共引文献133

同被引文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部