期刊文献+

古代治水、开河与通漕的历史逻辑 被引量:2

Historical Logic of Water Control, Opening up Waterways and Grain Transport by Water in Ancient China
原文传递
导出
摘要 政治是理解中国古代社会治水、开河与通漕历史逻辑的一把关键钥匙。从历史发展来看,先有中央集权的大一统体制,后有因治水而孕育的水利社会,而不是相反。随着历代政治中心和基本经济区不断分离,以及王朝集权政治的不断发展,运河得以开凿,各地漕粮源源不断地运往京师,漕运及漕运制度应运而生。但从历史逻辑来看,通漕与开河之间只存在着间接的因果关系,运河既非漕运制度化的充分条件,也非其必要条件。漕运的制度化归于运河的政治化,这不仅表现为运河与漕运职官设置日趋完善,还反映在中央政府不惜动用一切政治资源全力奉漕,甚至于牺牲局部利益,形成一股政治利益集团。 Politics is an important key to understanding the historical logic of water control, opening up waterways, and grain transport by water in ancient China. From the point of view of historical development, there was a centralized system of unification in the first place, and then the water conservancy society developing from water control and not the opposite. With the political center and the basic economic zone gradually separated, and the continuous development of centralized political dynasty, canals were dug and grain was constantly transported to the capital, and grain transport by water and the corresponding system thus came into being. From the historical logic, however, there is only indirect causality between grain transport by water and opening up waterways. Canals are neither a sufficient condition nor a necessary condition for the institutionalization of grain transport by water. Institutionalization of grain transport by water can be attributed to politicalization of canals, which is reflected not only by the improvement of canals and establishment of official positions in grain transport by water system, but also the fact that the central government used all political resources, and even sacrificed local interest to give full support to grain transport by water, and in this process emerged a political interest group.
作者 吴士勇 WU Shi-yong(College of History, Culture and Tourism, Huaiyin Normal College, Huaian, Jiangsu, 223001)
出处 《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第2期152-160,共9页 Journal of Shenzhen University:Humanities & Social Sciences
基金 江苏省社会科学基金项目"繁荣与凋敝:明清时期江北社会经济变迁研究"(14LSD001) 国家社科基金项目"水利公共工程与江淮海地区社会经济变迁研究"(14BZS040)
关键词 古代 治水 开河 通漕 政治化 Ancient water control open up waterways canal transport politics
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献99

  • 1李文治 江太新.《清代漕运》[M].,.第457页.
  • 2全汉昇.《唐宋帝国与运河》,上海:商务印书馆,1946年,第12页.
  • 3星斌夫.《大运河--中国の漕运》,东京:近藤出版社,1971年
  • 4星斌夫.《明代漕运の研究》,东京:日本学术振兴会,1963年.
  • 5星斌夫.《元代海运経営の実态》[J].歷史の研究,1980,(7).
  • 6星斌夫.《明代漕运の研究》,第七章.
  • 7星斌夫.《明清時代社會經濟史の研究》,东京:国书刊行会,1989年,第18-28、55-65页.
  • 8Harold Hinton, " Grain Transport via the Grand Canal, 1845 - 1901 ," Harvard Papers on China, No4, Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press, 1950.
  • 9Kate Leonard, "Grand Canal Grain Transport Management, " Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 22, No4 ( 1988 ).
  • 10吴缉华.《明代海运及运河的研究》,台北:中央研究院历史语言研究所,1961年.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部