期刊文献+

战略执行流程、中层经理战略承诺与员工绩效及态度——基于多案例的研究 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文通过分析多案例探索战略执行流程、中层经理战略承诺及员工绩效和态度的关系,构建了理论模型。研究发现:战略执行流程的人员和运营子流程对中层经理战略承诺水平有较大正向影响,而战略分解子流程对中层经理战略承诺影响不大;员工-组织关系(EOR)调节中层经理战略承诺水平对员工绩效和态度的影响:相互投入型EOR增强中层经理战略承诺水平对员工绩效和态度的正向影响;投资不足与准现货契约型EOR减弱中层经理战略承诺水平对员工绩效和态度的正向影响;过度投资型EOR提升中层经理战略承诺水平对员工绩效的正向影响,但对态度无调节作用。因此,中层经理应提高自身战略承诺水平,以获取较高的员工绩效和态度;高管层应以提高人员流程和运营流程成熟度为主,提高战略分解流程成熟度为辅来促进中层经理战略承诺水平的提升;企业应紧扣自身资源条件,全力构建相互投入型EOR,尽量规避准现货契约与投入不足型EOR的形成。 By multi-case study, this paper explores the relationship among strategic execution process, strategic commitment of middle managers and performance and attitudes of employees, and then builds a preliminary theoretical model. The results reveal that the strategic implementation process personnel and the operational sub-process have a significant positive impact on the level of strategic commitment of middle managers, while the strategic decomposition sub-process has little effect on the strategic commitment level of middle managers; the influence of strategic commitment level of middle managers on the performance and attitudes of employee is adjusted by employee-organization relationship: mutual input EOR can enhance the positive effect of middle manager's strategic commitment level on employee's performance and attitudes, the under- invested and quasi-spot contract EOR can weaken the positive effect of middle manager's strategic commitment level on employee's performance and attitudes, and the over-investment EOR can promote the positive effect of middle managers" strategic commitment level on employee performance, but has no moderating effect on attitudes. Therefore, middle managers should improve the strategic commitment level themselves in order to get higher performance and attitudes of employees; TMT should improve the strategic commitment level of middle managers by increasing the personnel process and the operational process and raising the strategy decomposition process; enterprises should construct the mutual input type EOR around their own resource condition and avoid the formation of quasi-spot contract and under-invested EOR.
出处 《企业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第4期103-109,共7页 Enterprise Economy
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"竞争性制度逻辑条件下公司品牌化的战略选择"(项目编号:71240012)
关键词 战略执行流程 中层经理战略承诺 员工-组织关系 员工绩效及态度 Strategic strategic execution process strategic commitment of middle manager EOR personnel performance and attitude
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献19

  • 1薛云奎,齐大庆,韦华宁.中国企业战略执行现状及执行力决定因素分析[J].管理世界,2005,21(9):88-98. 被引量:94
  • 2Floyd, S W, and Wooldridge, B. Managing strategic consensus: The foundation of effective implementation[J]. Academy of Management Executive,1992, 6(4):27--39.
  • 3Kellermanns, Franz W, Walter, J, Lechner, C, and Floyd ,S W. The lack of consensus about strategic consensus: Advancing theory and research[J]. Journal of Management, 2005, 31(5):719--737.
  • 4Rapert, Molly Inhofe,et al. The strategic implementation process evoking strategic consensus through communication[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2002, 55(4): 301--310.
  • 5Wooldridge, B, and Floyd, S W. Research note and communications strategic process effect on consensus[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1989,10(3): 295 -302.
  • 6Boswell, Wendy. Aligning employees with the organization's strategic objectives: Out of line of sight, out of mind[J]. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2006,17 (9): 1 489-- 1 511.
  • 7Gagnon, Mark A, et al. Employee alignment with strategic change: A study of strategy-supportive behavior among blue-collar employees[J]. Journal of Managerial Issues, 2008, 20(4) :425--433.
  • 8黄再胜.企业员工战略共识的结构维度与测量--中国情景下的探索性研究[R].上海市社会科学界第七届学术年会论文集,2009.
  • 9Markoczy, Livia. Consensus formation during strategic change[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22(11):1 013--1 031.
  • 10Dess, G G, and Priem, R L. Consensus-performance research: Theoretical and empirical extensions[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 1995, 32(4): 401--417.

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部