期刊文献+

A型肉毒毒素治疗效果的评价方法及进展 被引量:8

A Review of Current Parametersand Retention Rate in Assessing Therapeutic Effect of Botulinum Toxin-Afor Aesthetic Procedures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 肉毒毒素作为一种神经制剂,在医疗美容领域具有广泛的应用。正确评价肉毒毒素的治疗效果,对于指导肉毒毒素的用药具有重要意义。本文就目前文献中肉毒毒素的评价指标及特点进行综述。肉毒毒素的评价主要围绕其有效性和安全性展开,有效性评价包括主观指标(如满意度评分/患者报告量表/第三方评价量表等)及客观指标;同时将逐一介绍这些评价方法及其优缺点,并重点提出将保留率作为评价肉毒素治疗的有效性指标及其目前研究状况、特点和进展。 Botulinum toxin-A is one type of neurotoxin, and has been widely used in medical aesthetics. Therefore it is important to accurately assess the clinical effect of botulinum toxin-A. Here we reviewed current parameters assessing the effect of Botulinum toxin-A in literature: effcacy and safety The effcacy of BTX-A injection is measured in manyways, including subjective questionnaires (e.g. patient’s personalsatisfaction scale/Patient-reported outcomes/subjective scales)and objective parameters. Here we will discuss in details the pros and cons of these assessment systems. Further we will introduce the use of retention rate as an objective parameter in assessingthe therapeutic effect of Botulinum toxin-A, with focus on its current use, featuresand development.
作者 费杨虹虹 骆叶 张旭东 FEIYANG Hong-hong;LUO Ye;ZHANG Xu-dong(Department of Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery, PLA 117 Hospital, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang,China;Public Affairs-Chinese Botulinum Neurotoxin Research Institute, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang,China)
出处 《中国美容医学》 CAS 2018年第4期141-144,共4页 Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
关键词 A型肉毒毒素 有效性 安全性 保留率 botulinum toxin-a effecacy safety retention rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献14

  • 1Graeme J. Sills, Linda J. Stephen, John Paul Leach, et al. Sodi- um valproate versus lamotrigine: A randomized comparison of effi- cacy, tolerability and effects on circulating androgenic hormones in newly diagnosed epilepsy [ J ]. Epilepsy Research , 2007,75 ( 2 - 3): 122-129.
  • 2Deleu D, Aarons L, Ahmed IA, Estimation of population pharma- cokinetic parameters of free-phenytoin in adult epileptic patients[J]. Arch. Med. Res, 2005, 36(1) : 49 -53.
  • 3Chung S, Wang N, Hank N. Comparative, retention rates and long-term tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs [ J ] , Seizure, 2007,16(4) : 296 -304.
  • 4Ebru Arhan, Ayse Serdaroglu, et al. Drug treatment failures and effectivity in children with newly diagnosed epilepsy [ J ]. Seizure, 2010,19(9) : 553 -557.
  • 5Chung S, Wang N, Hank N. Comparative, retention rates and long-term tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs [ J ]. Seizure, 2007,16(4) : 296 -304.
  • 6M. Nieto-Barrera, M. Brozmanova, A comparison of monotherapy with lamotrigine or carhamazepine in patients with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy[J]. Epilepsy Research, 46(2001 ) : 145 -155.
  • 7Linda J. Stephen, Graeme J. Sills, John Paul Leach, Sodium val- proate versus lamotrigine: A randomized comparison of efficacy, tolerability and effects on circulating androgenic hormones in newly diagnosed epilepsy [ J ]. Epilepsy Research, 2007,75 ( 2 - 3 ) : 122 - 129.
  • 8Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy: Proposal for a revised classification of epilepsies and epileptic, syndromes [ J ]. Epilepsia, 1989, 30 (4) : 389 -399.
  • 9Aldenkamp AP. Cognitive and behaviooral assessment in clinical trials: when should they be done[ J ]. Epilepsy Res, 45 (2001) : 155 - 159.
  • 10Tracy G, Elinor B M, Blaise B, et al. ILAE Treatment Guide- lines: Evidence-based Analysis of Antiepileptic Drug Efficacy and Effectiveness as Initial Monotherapy for Epileptic Seizures and Syn5 dromes[Jl. Epilepsia, 2006, 47(7) :1094 - 1120.

共引文献21

同被引文献63

引证文献8

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部