摘要
何炳棣曾从省级人丁尾数出发,指出"丁"为征税单位,而非实际人口数,因而存在着尾数。清初至乾隆三十七年(1772),各省级志书始终详细记载了需要征收赋税的额内人丁,以及与赋税征收相关的额内转为额外的人丁尾数;康熙五十年(1711)以后,不再记载作为永不加赋对象的纯粹额外滋生人丁尾数。这一变化体现了清初人丁编审制度的缺陷,并客观上揭示了传统人口统计与赋税稽征走向分离的真正原因。
He Bindi pointed out“Ding”is not a unit of population,but that of taxation,according to the existence of decimalin“Ding”. However,there wasa long ignored change that happened from the beginning of Qing to the 37th year Qinglong's reign(1772 ):The decimals in those numbers that was related to taxation were all well kept;otherwise,they were deleted after the yearof the 50th year of Kangxi's Reign (1711) . This change shows the disadvantages of the census-taxation system in the early Qingdynasty,and also explains why the census system and taxation system were separated afterwards.
作者
向志春
XIANG Zhi-chun(No.1 High School of Qianyang in Hongjiang Huaihua Hunan 418100)
出处
《怀化学院学报》
2018年第3期70-75,共6页
Journal of Huaihua University
关键词
人丁尾数
额外人丁
额内人丁
滋生人丁
编审制度
decimal in“Ding”
“Ding”free from tax
“Ding”for taxation
new“Ding”
census-taxationsystem