摘要
面对被告人翻供,我国法律及司法解释主要是从讯问的主体、方式、制作程序、有无刑讯逼供等方面,对被告人的口供进行程序审查。然而,被告人翻供的情形和理由复杂多样,现有规范要么属于立法空白,要么属于指导性或宣示性规范,既缺少明确的操作指引规则,又缺少违反这些规则的法律后果。为此,有必要从讯问主体和方式、讯问笔录制作程序、司法机关有无非法取证行为、如何对待重复性供述及事后救济程序等方面,进一步补充完善。
The procedural examination of defendant confession withdrawal in Chinese law and judicial interpretation mainly includes the examination of defendant's oral confession from body and ways of interrogation, the oral confession record production procedure, and confession by torture, and so on. However, why and how the defendant withdraw the con-fession are diverse and complex, while the existing regulations are not practical with just instructive and declarative norms, which lack of clear operation guidelines and corresponding legal consequences. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the procedure examination from the following aspects: the interrogation subject and way, interrogation record making procedure, illegal evidence collection behavior of judicial organs, and the way to treat the repeatability of confession and postrelief process, etc..
作者
王海
杨琳
WANG Hai;YANG Lin
出处
《四川警察学院学报》
2018年第2期1-10,共10页
Journal of Sichuan Police College
基金
2017年度国家社科基金一般项目<审判中心主义视域下被追诉人取证能力强化机制研究>(17BFX181)
2016年度陕西省教育厅哲学社会科学重点研究项目<宽严相济视野下的未成年人诉讼制度创新及实践检讨>(16JZ087)
关键词
翻供
程序审查
证据能力
排除规则
corifession withdrawal
procedural examination
evidence ability
the rule of eliminating